Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
;t4ip..-,, ' ',',-11';•.- , ; 1 ^,7.4t: <br /> maximum was arrived at. The added that the formula should <br /> stand as is for the public hearing as it will likely be con- <br /> sidered by the Board at a later date. <br /> MOTION ADDITION: Add maximum buffer to 6.23 la. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> Wilson inquired about what was meant by natural state in 6. <br /> 23.1. <br /> MOTION: Wilson notioned that the following be added to the reference <br /> to natural state in 6.23.1 <br /> ". . . state,unless the area is subject to <br /> serious erosion, in which case an erosion <br /> resistant vegetatvie cover shall be estab- <br /> lished and maintained. <br /> Po].atty indicated 6.23. and 6.23 f. addressed this. <br /> Crawford felt there was a distinction. <br /> Laszlo seconded the motion <br /> VOTE: Unanimous )Harris out of room/did not vote) <br /> Crawford questioned 4.2.26. She asked if there was a need <br /> to formally adopt the document reference if the language was <br /> adopted in an ordinance. <br /> Polatty responded affirmatively and asked if the Board pref- <br /> erred a separate public hearing recommendation. He noted <br /> three work objectives of the public hearing: "Changes to the <br /> zoning ordinance; 2) adoption of the Task Force Report, and <br /> 3) zoning of Cheeks. <br /> Crawford recommended against lumping these in a single public <br /> hearing. <br /> Crawford inquired about the technical definition of storm- <br /> water management in 6.23.3. She noted it defines runoff, but <br /> not be technique to handle it. She requested that examples <br /> be used until a stormwater management ordinance was developed. <br /> Luce responded he would put it in the definition section. <br /> Crawfrod asked what the stormwater manavement TrIPMCIIrne. .---. <br />