Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-17-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 03-17-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 1:51:45 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 3:17:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/17/1982
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820317
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. , . <br /> ..,. .., <br /> : ... . , . <br /> . ., • ' , . . . <br /> The Board Agreed to extend the meeting for an additional fifteen minutes <br /> to complete the review of the Water Resources Task Farce recommendations. <br /> Recommendation 413: <br /> S.Z. Friedman expressed concern that the Report gives the impression that <br /> the formula iebeing pushed by the Forestry Service,, notions that the <br /> formula in the recommendation was more stungent. Friedman cited portions <br /> of the source of the formula: "How Far From A Stream Should A Logging <br /> Road Be Located" in the Journal of Forestry, May 1957. Friedman felt <br /> that the study area did not correspond to Orange County; that the 100 year <br /> flood plain criteria addition was without justification; that the formula <br /> derived in the paper was not intended to be applied to municipal watershed <br /> and had been doubled Orbitiarily. That only a tenuous relationship had <br /> been found between sediment movement and slope; and that the formula was <br /> not booneAmt by the duty as the study was marginal in technical competemp <br /> and hed. achieved an aura of respectability having been cited and utilized <br /> so frequently. He emphasized that the formula was incorrect and did not <br /> apply to Orange County, suggesting that the Board detete the recommendatiol <br /> as technically incompetent and look for something else. <br /> As Friedman had done a simple correlation test on the data, Gordon asked <br /> What method he had used. Kizer asked if Friedman had data to prove the <br /> inaccuracy of the formula. Friedman responded that the studies conclusiori! <br /> were not supported by the data and were refuted by the simple correlation <br /> test he had done. He emphasized that even if data were correct it would <br /> not apply to Orange County as the study area was a vergon forest with a <br /> - logging road and the tests were visual on nature and did not identify other <br /> pollutants or carriers. <br /> Cleary asked if Friedman felt the formula was merely over protective. ' <br /> Friedman felt it was unnecessarily so and suggested a monitoring program <br /> to determine stream quality degradation levels emphasing the County's <br /> responsiblity to spend money to do so rather than to act on guessing. <br /> He asked if this was really a panic situation. <br /> Luce responed that although the formula is not perfect, it will assure <br /> protection. Friedman felt that there was a need to determine acceptable <br /> levels of pollution. He noted the restriction on bottom land. Don <br /> Cox noted that farmland is exempt. Crawford clarified that farmland was <br /> exempt from the Zoning Ordinance. Shanklin asked if these requirements <br /> would then only apply to the 1-85 - US 70 Corridor in Cheeks Township. <br /> Luce responded that some land outside the corridor is rural residential <br /> and that the regulations would apply to all residential uses. Shanklin <br /> asked f it would apply in unzoned Cheeks and Cedar Grove Townships. <br /> Crawford responded that it would apply whereever the Zoning Ordinance <br /> applies. <br /> Kizer moved approval of the recommprIHAri,,, r.,-.....4.-- -- -- , - - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.