Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-17-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 03-17-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 1:51:45 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 3:17:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/17/1982
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820317
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. . , . <br /> I '.iralilt . <br /> .-- <br /> , _. _• .. ..... • _ <br /> • <br /> Steve Yuhasz inquired as to how easements would be identified and emphasize <br /> that the need for accuracy required on identifying a field would require <br /> a survey and result in increased expense. Polatty responded that it wa! <br /> a trade off between expense and pollut4on. Gordon felt that in the past <br /> people have not considered the pollution costs of development. <br /> Friedman inquired if there was an inspections process to determine the <br /> need for repairs. Luce responded that the inspections activity was address <br /> .__ . _ __ _ <br /> --- in the -second part of the recommendation. <br /> Friedman expressed concern with the costs involved, especially if the <br /> desired location was changed at some later point. <br /> Crawford indicated that the Board was not involved at the moment in the <br /> fine tuning of the recommendations, but that those concerns would be <br /> considered at a later date. Friedman responded that functioning does not <br /> tend to be a iitiblio process. Crawford responded that implementation would <br /> require a public hearing. <br /> Kizer felt that this recommendation would be a monster to administer. He <br /> asked why 3 or 4 easements would not be identified to accomplish the same <br /> purpose. <br /> Gordon expressed concerns about the rate of septic tank failure in the <br /> County. She noted that septic tank failure could threaten an entire subdiv. <br /> She felt that this recommendation was an improvment over nothigg. <br /> Crawford asked if there was any correlation between soils and system failux <br /> along streams, along the attached report. Luce responed that the point <br /> of the Report was the problems experienced in the tfland area. <br /> Gordon Motioned approval of the recommendation as amended with the conclusic <br /> of the missing statement. Irvin seconded the motion. <br /> Kizer cited harsher requirements such as certification of homes, <br /> He expressed dissatisfaction with the massive approach outlined in the <br /> recommendation. <br /> Gordon expressed concern that failing systems in subdivisions would lead to <br /> demand for water and sewer lines to remedy the problem, resulting in an ' <br /> economic burden. <br /> Brian Dodge noted the alternatives as; 1) condemn (and; 2) extend sewer <br /> lines; or 3) assure a back up system. He noted the last item was the <br /> least expensive. <br /> • <br /> Don Cox noted that the existence of a second site provides for an alternative <br /> usage system and the option to alternate sites. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.