Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-17-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 03-17-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 1:51:45 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 3:17:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/17/1982
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820317
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. 7if777N:" <br /> 1 <br /> +-:■'1.14i;:;";1:!j,1,1; <br /> 1, <br /> . -. <br /> Recommendation OA: <br /> Luce noted a phrase deleted in the recommendation as printed. <br /> S.J. Friedman criticized the necessity and redundancy of the recommendatio <br /> as he felt that the Health Department approved drainage fields with suffic <br /> area, even for repairs._ He clarified this tp mean additiOnal lines. _He <br /> suggested that the Board and staff contact the Health Department to determ <br /> the merits of the recommendation before discussion of it. <br /> Luce responded that this recommendation referred to an easement which thel <br /> Department did not require. Crawford recognized that the recommendation w4 <br /> beyond the Health Department's requirements. Friedman -repondedthat this <br /> easement was UnneCessary as current policies assured fUttire repair capacit! <br /> Luce noted that the easement prevents the location of any structure on thai <br /> Gordon felt that any potential redundancy could be taken care of through <br /> implementation and his custom was appropriate. <br /> General discussion followed: <br /> Shanklin questioned the need for the requirement. Cleary clarified that it <br /> restricted development on an area where future lines might go. <br /> General discussion of the intent of the recommendation followed. <br /> Shanklin felt there were too Many interpretations. Luce clarified that the <br /> Purpose of the easement was to allow for a second system. Luce read the <br /> recommenation with the missing portion: <br /> ORANGE COUNTY SHOULD ADOPT THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> REGARDING ON-SITE WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SYSTEMS: ALL NEWLY <br /> PLATTED LOTS BORDERING ON PERENNIAL STREAMS AND REQUIRING <br /> AN ON-SITE WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM SHOULD SHOW A SECOND <br /> DISPOSAL AREA TO BE RECORDED AS AN EASEMENT ON THE FINAL <br /> PLAT AND NO BUILDING OR OTHER ACTIVITY SHOULD OCCUR ON THIS <br /> PORTION OF THE PARCEL OF LAND WHICH WOULD PREVENT ITS FUTURE <br /> USE FOR ON-SITE WASTE DISPOSAL. ORANGE COUNTY SHOULD <br /> INVESTIGATE DEVELOPING AN ON-SITE WASTE WATER DISPOSAL <br /> SYSTEM MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR THE THREE <br /> WATER SYSTEM WATERSHEDS IN THE COUNTY. <br /> Shanklin asked if power lines would be allowed. Luce responded that those <br /> structures to be restricted would be stipulated for the easement. <br /> Gordon asked if one can build on existing lines. Cannity responded that <br /> the Health Department will ask whir itnii ......., .....—.. . . . . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.