Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-08-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 03-08-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 4:53:34 PM
Creation date
12/14/2016 3:13:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/8/1982
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820308
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
00694 <br /> Vkftrg. <br /> STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ... <br /> DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <br /> P.O,BOX 25201 <br /> RALEIGH 27611 MvISMNOFAVW1ON <br /> . - <br /> JAMES B.HUNT JR 1919}733-2491 <br /> GOVERNOR <br /> January 26, 1932 . <br /> WILLIAM Fl.ROBERSON.JR <br /> SECRETARY <br /> Mr. Fred Luce <br /> Orange County Planning Department <br /> 106 E. Margaret Lane <br /> . Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br /> Ref: Review of Proposed Midway Airport Plan <br /> Dear Fred: <br /> Per your request, we have reviewed the plan for the <br /> proposed Midway Airport with respect to FAA design <br /> ,. .. <br /> criteria. The attached table shows the most important , . . <br /> design differences. As you can see, the airport as <br /> currently proposed comes closer to meeting the utility <br /> criteria, although its runway length would place it in <br /> the transport category. <br /> We wish to emphasize that neither federal nor state <br /> regulations require a private airport to meet FAA desigh <br /> standards. However, failure to meet such standards could <br /> have an adverse effect on funding should the airport <br /> become publicy owned in the future. It could also <br /> adversely affect the potential for an instrument approach <br /> procedure, which would probably be desirable early in <br /> the life of this airport. One item which is not shown <br /> on the plan is the approach zones for the runway. There <br /> would probably have to be some land interest for areas <br /> within about 2,000' of each end of the runway so that <br /> trees, powerlines, and other obstructions could be removed, <br /> if necessary. <br /> If we can provide further assistance on this matter, <br /> please advise. <br /> Sincerely, . <br /> . . <br /> Bruce E. Matthews , <br /> Airports Development Specialist <br /> BEM:by <br /> z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.