Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
00716 <br /> 7.16.4 Permitted intensity of <br /> oment <br /> The requirements and limitations that The intensity level that <br /> apply within the PD-01 District are is permitted in PD-OI will not <br /> established in Articles 5 and 6. be exceeded by this develop- <br /> ment, if it were built at the <br /> level proposed. <br /> 7.16.5 Setbacks Required Adjacent to The setbacks around the perimeter <br /> Residential Districts of the site are proposed to be <br /> 35'• This distance does not <br /> Where PD-OI districts adjoin residential provide enough buff& between <br /> districts without an intevening street, a development of this.intensity <br /> a setback of a leat twenty feet shall and the adjacent property <br /> be provided. This are shall not be that is zoned AR. <br /> used for partking areas. <br /> 7.16.6 <br /> a) External Relationships: <br /> The site plan should show how the <br /> development will provide protection <br /> for the development from potentially <br /> adverse surrounding influences and <br /> provide protection for 'surrounding <br /> areas from potentially adverse in- <br /> fluenees within the development. <br /> 1. Principal access points shall be 1. There is only one access <br /> desimed to encourage smooth point to this entire devel <br /> traffic flow. Street layout opment and that acess road <br /> shall not connect minor resi- runs across the end of the <br /> dential streets with:collector proposed runway of Midway air- <br /> streets. port. The Planning Staff feels <br /> there should be direct access <br /> to Highway 54 to the project, <br /> that does not cross in front <br /> of the runway. Given the <br /> number of trips generated by <br /> this development it would not <br /> be unreasonable to require <br /> two access points; to separ- <br /> ate some of the traffic. <br /> 2. Access for pedestrians and motor 2. There is no access for ped- <br /> cyclists shall be safe and con- estrians indicated on the site <br /> venient. Where there street plan. Since this is a rural <br /> crossings, they shall be so lace- area it can be assumed there <br /> ted as to be safe, shah l. be marked would not be large numbers of <br /> and controlled. people walking to work. <br /> 3. Protection of visibility at inter- 3. Visibility at the pro- <br /> sections. Shall be as set forth in posed intersect in meets the <br /> Article 6. minimum standards set forth <br /> in Artilce 6. <br /> 2L-1 <br />