Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-25-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 01-25-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2017 9:58:58 AM
Creation date
12/14/2016 2:14:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/25/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820125
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Board Minutes <br /> September 1, 1981 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Wilson commented that he saw a problem with this reaantendatiz <br /> in that it proposed to give scare of the Lake Orange water to <br /> the Orange-Alamance Water Systems which was pumping it out of <br /> the Neuse Basin to bene„ a conflict with recommiation <br /> number ane. <br /> Wilsan asked why the water supply for Hillsborough decreased <br /> with time. Luce replied that it was because of the withdrawal <br /> upstream at Corporation Lake. <br /> Kizer motioned approval of the secand recommendation of the <br /> Water Task Force. Cleary seconded. Motion carried with 4 in <br /> favor, 3 against and Bacon and Laszlo abstaining. <br /> Recommendation #3 <br /> Water conservation in receiving and withdrawal basins. <br /> Luce described OWASA's water conservation plan. Se said there <br /> was no similAr plan in place for northern Orange. <br /> Kizer motioned approval of the recommendation. Laszlo sec <br /> Approved unanimously. <br /> ' Ill Recommendation #4 <br /> Identification of prime reservoir sites. <br /> Luce described the criteria which were used in selecting the f <br /> prime reservoir sites from among the twenty-nine potential sit <br /> identified in the report. <br /> Kizer questioned why only five sites were selected. Irvin notE <br /> that industrial development in and around Hillsborough could <br /> cause a great demand for water in the future. <br /> Kizer motioned that reconrendaticn number four be accepted but <br /> that in addition sites 17 and 18 in the report an the north an <br /> south forks of the Little River be included as protected sites. <br /> Irvin seconded. <br /> Luce noted that the five sites identified in the Report are <br /> within protected watersheds. The protection of these new <br /> sites would require that additional areas of the County be <br /> identified as protected watersheds if the same status was <br /> afforded to them as to Cane Creek reservoir for example. <br /> Ayes: Kizer, Gordon, Cleary, Harris, Wilson, Laszlo, Irvin. <br /> 44/ Noes None <br /> Abstentions: Lunsford. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.