Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
0031'18 <br /> Planning Board member Kizer asked several questions about fire hydrants <br /> (none are planned) , the cul de sac turn arounds (about 70 feet), and if any <br /> treatment was planned for mosquitos or bugs at the lagoon. <br /> Mr. Zucchino said he didn't think any treatment was planned. That <br /> Chlorinization was planned from the lagoon to the field for spraying. Mr. <br /> Kizer then asked if the lagoon was raw sewage and if so, how were solids <br /> removed. Mr. Zucchino said the lagoon was raw sewage and there was a solid <br /> removal screen but he didn't know how it worked. Mr. Kizer then asked about <br /> . _ <br /> the elevation of the wells planned for the site and their relation to the <br /> lagoon drainage site. Mr. Zucchino responded he thought elevation of the wells <br /> was about 35'-40' above the lagoon. The lagoon is the lowest point of the:;site. <br /> Planning Board member Shanklin asked about the water quality. Mr. <br /> Zucchino said this system was designed to meet the State standards. <br /> Responding to an inquiry about roads fromCommissioner Willhoit, Mr. <br /> Zucchino said that the developer had planned 4" crush and run with a chemicni <br /> binder bUt that the Planning Staff had moved the original entrance to the <br /> site and then said the longer entrance should be paved. He said the cost of <br /> thetiaVing is twice as expensive as the treatment the developer had planned. <br /> Planning Board master Irvin had some concern about carving sites out of <br /> the woodland. Mr. Cannity said the landscaping would be kept to a minimum; <br /> that sone of the trees were twenty-five years old and the developer planned <br /> to retain all natural landscaping possible. <br /> Mr. Cannity said that an active agricultural operations was across the <br /> street from the development and the Planning Staff felt that moving a portion <br /> of the units would stop some of the dust; and that with the thirty-five units <br /> down the street (the pre-existing mobile home park) there existed a potential <br /> for a traffic problem if the original entrance was maintained. <br /> Ommissioner Willhoit encouraged the Planning Board to consider a trade <br /> off between the road requirements and the density of development planned. <br /> Chairman Whitted asked if any member of the audience wished to give <br /> evidence. <br /> Mr. James Pritchard—said he was a neighbor of Mr. Ford's ( the develop- <br /> er) and Mr. Ford did some work for him on his (Mr. Pritchard's) mobile home <br /> park. Mr. Pritchard said Mr. Ford did good work and did what he'd said he'd <br /> do. Mr. Pritchard is in favor of this request for Bingham Woods. He said <br />