Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-22-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 01-22-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2017 11:09:20 AM
Creation date
12/14/2016 2:08:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/22/1982
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820122
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. <br /> 2. <br /> 3. <br /> 4. Commissioner Gustaveson noted that the stated goal of the <br /> 5• Efland Ruritan Club (the other bidder for the property) was public <br /> 6. recreation and if both parties were agreeable to restrictions <br /> 7. such restrictions would not be unilaterally imposed. <br /> 8. Commissioner Willhoit said there was some disagreement over <br /> 9. the real value of the property; that if the property sold for <br /> 10. closer to its appraised value ($45,000 for land and $45,000 for <br /> 11. buildings) then restrictions would not be proper. <br /> 12. Chairman Compton said the Board of Education had never <br /> 13. received a request for that property from the Board of Commis- <br /> 140 sioners until after the property was placed up for bid. Com- <br /> 15. missioner Gustaveson disagreed saying that further public use <br /> 16. of that property had been part of the planning sessions with the <br /> i7. Board of Education for several years. <br /> 18. The Board of Education reiterated its opinion that it was <br /> 19. too late to place restrictions on the sale of the property. <br /> ^G• Commissioner Willhoit restated the Board of Commissioners' <br /> �• feeling that the high bid for the property ($45,100 at this <br /> 22. time) was :Low but would be acceptable to the Board of Commis- <br /> 23. sioners if subject to certain assurances regarding public <br /> 24. - accessibility and a reversion clause as explained by Commissioner <br /> 25. Gustaveson. Commissioner Willhoit said this was a question of <br /> 26. public trust for public property and that stipulations on the <br /> 27. sale would document that trust for the public. Mr. Efland said <br /> 28. the Board of Education was an "elected body" and would "exercise" <br /> 29. its "responsibility" at the "point of sale." <br /> • <br /> 30. Mr. Faribault, Jr. , said he had concerns about the use of <br /> 31. the property; he felt it should be used by all members of the <br /> 12. community and should benefit all the community. <br /> 3• Mr. Haithcock moved to adjourn the joint meeting with the <br /> 34• Board of Commissioners; Mr. John Thomas Walker seconded that <br /> 35• motion. Vote: Ayes, 12; noes, 0. <br /> 36. <br /> 37. Richard E. Whitted, Chairman <br /> 38. Paulette Pridgen-Pond, Clerk <br /> 39. <br /> 40. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.