Orange County NC Website
8 <br /> 2. Orange County Property Naming Policy <br /> Bonnie Hammersley reviewed the background information below: <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> On March 1, 2016 Commissioner Bernadette Pelissier petitioned that the Orange County <br /> Property Naming Policy be discussed at a BOCC work session. Specifically, Commissioner <br /> Pelissier as well as other Commissioners have requested that the naming policy discussion <br /> include clarification on the following issues: <br /> • Under what circumstances should a property be named? <br /> • What can be named? <br /> • Should a county property be named for a living person? <br /> • Definition of renaming a property? <br /> She said attached to the abstract are the three (3) previous abstracts to amend the <br /> policy, a list of County owned properties that have been named for an individual, and a <br /> benchmark analysis of organizational naming policies in the area. <br /> Commissioner Price said some schools were left off of the listing. <br /> Jeff Thompson, Director of Asset Management Services, said these buildings are not <br /> owned by Orange County. He said the facilities listed are ones that are deeded to the County. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said her main interest is on 2.1.3 on page 13 of attachment one, <br /> which states: official names or titles for property belonging to the County shall only be changed <br /> by the Board of County Commissioners as it deems appropriate. She said this should be more <br /> thought out than "deems appropriate". She said the Board should be judicious in re-naming a <br /> facility, and there should be concrete reasons that mean something. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said there should be a larger community consensus in re- <br /> naming a facility, and a more inclusive process such as a public hearing. <br /> Chair McKee agreed with Commissioner Pelissier as related to public input. He said the <br /> issue of naming brings up other issues and it can get"sticky". He suggested the language of <br /> "as it deems appropriate, after public input." <br /> Commissioner Burroughs said, in her experience, a committee is appointed for new <br /> buildings to address this process from the beginning. She said she preferred not naming a <br /> building after a living person, unless there are extraordinary circumstances and a public <br /> discussion is completed. <br /> Commissioner Price said if the Board wants to honor someone, then do so and do not <br /> wait until they pass away. She said she is in favor of naming buildings after living people. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs agreed with Commissioner Price. He said Commissioner Dorosin <br /> sent in an email, in which he also agreed. He said the recent re-naming of the farmer's market <br /> after Congressman Price was a good example, as he was able to attend the ceremony and <br /> appreciate the recognition. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he would like to name buildings after things other than <br /> people. <br /> Commissioner Pelissier said people have approached her asking why the Board re- <br /> named a facility after David Price, and she is adamant about re-naming a building without a <br /> public process. <br /> Commissioner Rich referred to page 13, section 2.1.2, and asked if rooms, within <br /> buildings, are currently being named. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said yes, at the Orange County Library. He said a room was <br /> added after the library was built, for a collection of books that a resident donated. <br />