Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
6 <br /> • Vibration (Sec. 6.4.4) <br /> • Air Pollution (Sec. 6.4.5) <br /> • Disposal of Liquid Wastes (Sec. 6.4.6) <br /> • Hazardous Materials (Sec. 6.4.7) <br /> • Utilities (including water use limitations; any use projected to require <br /> more than 30,000 gallons per day cannot be permitted by-right) (Sec. <br /> 6.4.8) <br /> • Solid Waste (Sec. 6.4.9) <br /> • Service & Outdoor Storage (Sec. 6.4.10) <br /> o Architectural Design Standards (Sec. 6.5.1) <br /> o Landscaping, Buffers & Tree Protection (Sec. 6.8) <br /> o Parking, Loading & Circulation (Sec. 6.9) <br /> o Outdoor Lighting (Sec. 6.11) <br /> o Signs (Sec. 6.12) <br /> o Stream Buffers, Stormwater Management, and Soil Erosion & Sedimentation <br /> Control (Sec. 6.13 to 6.15) <br /> o Traffic Impact Analysis (Sec. 6.17) <br /> Recommendation for Tonight <br /> 1. Conduct the continued public hearing and accept comment on the proposed <br /> amendments; <br /> 2. Close the public hearing; <br /> 3. Deliberate on the petition as desired; and <br /> 4. Decide on one of the following options: <br /> a. Adopt the proposed amendments by approving the Statement of Consistency <br /> (Attachment 2) and Ordinance (Attachment 3); <br /> b. Defer a decision to a later BOCC regular meeting date; <br /> c. Refer the item back to the Planning Board for a specific purpose; Deny the <br /> proposed amendments. <br /> (Note: Section 2.2.8 Effect of Denial on Subsequent Applications of the UDO states that no <br /> application for the same or similar amendment may be submitted for a period of one year. The <br /> one-year period begins on the date of denial.) <br /> Planning Board member Tony Blake said he had nothing to add. <br /> Chris Cole, Orange County resident, said he spoke at the previous Quarterly Public <br /> Hearing (QPH), and thanked the Board for making these changes. He said this is a huge step <br /> in the right direction. He said he is a certified public accountant, and his familiar with this area. <br /> He suggested the removal of four more items from the list of permitted uses: 3169, 3219, <br /> 3261, and 3262. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he appreciated the Planning Board members being present. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he does not understand some of the list of permitted uses. <br /> He referred to page 84, and asked planning staff if Emergency Services has reviewed this list, <br /> which includes some highly flammable items. He said he also has concerns about Polystyrene <br /> Foam products. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he also does not known what some of these products are, <br /> and he is uncomfortable approving anything until he is better informed. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs suggested giving the BOCC a week to review/pull items that they <br /> do not understand or do not want on this list. He said this all relates to item 6e, the North <br /> American Industry Classification System (NAICS), about which he has no understanding. <br />