Orange County NC Website
13 <br /> Commissioner Burroughs said she will second Commissioner Dorosin's motion when it <br /> is made, and agrees with Robert Dowling as well. She referred to the issue of older adults and <br /> seniors, saying she would prefer to focus on those of the lowest income in this population. <br /> She asked if this is addressed in the scoring. <br /> Audrey Spencer-Horsley said it does get addressed in the scoring. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said he is comfortable with this. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if it is 50 to 80, or 60 to 80%. <br /> Travis Myren said Commissioner Dorosin suggested 60%. <br /> Commissioner Rich said she still sees a strong need for workforce housing, and would <br /> not want to drop lower in the 50-80%. She said changes can be made if necessary as things <br /> unfold. <br /> Commissioner Price said she agreed with focusing on the 0-60%, and getting rid of the <br /> caps. She asked if it known how much will be given for each unit. <br /> Audrey Spencer-Horsley said that almost all of the projects have other funding. She <br /> said the applicants or non-profits leverage these funds. She said there is also the urgent repair <br /> program, state tax credit program, other municipalities, etc. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said no cap, no cap, 20%, no cap. <br /> Chair McKee said the goal is 1,000 units. He said the money will not stretch to 1,000 <br /> units, and the wording may need to change to "up to 1,000 units." <br /> Audrey Spencer-Horsley said the goal may be more attainable than expected. <br /> Commissioner Price said she votes strongly in favor of no caps. <br /> Chair McKee said he would like to try to favor the residents of Orange County, within I <br /> the limits before the Board. <br /> John Roberts said there may be a way to do that through the Housing Authority Board. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked if a certain point total could be added to the matrix for <br /> projects that offer housing to residents of Orange County or those who work in Orange County. <br /> John Roberts said that may be possible. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said to check if that is legal for the providers to do. <br /> Chair McKee said he is not suggesting doing anything at this time, but it would be good <br /> as a driving thought for further discussion. <br /> John Roberts said he can look into that option, and thinks the Housing Authority may <br /> have federal authority to do something along those lines. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said his basic concern is to address the needs of the residents <br /> of Orange County, and those who work here. He said there is such a vacuum at the State and <br /> Federal level, and the County's work may end up be subsumed by the needs of millions, if care <br /> is not taken to avoid it. <br /> Delores Bailey, Affordable Housing Provider, said the Board's intention is good, but she <br /> is sensitive to those who use to live in Orange County and were priced out. She said she is <br /> unsure of how to undo this reality and bring these people back to Orange County. She said a <br /> homeless person has no address, so their residency is unclear. She said the whole topic <br /> binds her up. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked if Delores Bailey would feel more comfortable if the <br /> wording addressed those who work, reside or have resided in Orange County. <br /> Delores Bailey said that adds another level of fact checking into the process. She said <br /> she has great interest in those who work in Orange County but have to live elsewhere. <br /> Commissioner Burroughs said, to some extent, the County is already in the vacuum <br /> described by Commissioner Jacobs. She asked if people are already moving in from other <br /> states to secure affordable housing. <br />