Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br /> 7-k . ,. . <br /> 1 Board minutes which talked about the densities not being consistent with <br /> 2 the Duke Forest recommendations. - <br /> 3 Commissionemartwell questioned the land use designation for the <br /> 4 --niture landfilitp .and Collins indicated that it is property that is not <br /> 5 toned for a land use or a landfill but is a potential landfill site <br /> 6 Before the property could -be used as a landfill a special use permit would <br /> 7 have to be approved by the Commissioners. Commissioner Hartwell then <br /> 8 requested that the status of the property be more clearly shown on County <br /> 9 planning maps shown to the public. <br /> 0 <br /> 1 Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner <br /> :2 Carey to approved the Planning Board recommendation as stated below: <br /> 13 , . <br /> 141i (1) Approval of the Transition Area extension into the full' extent of the <br /> 15 :.oliii Creek basin eicce.t in Duke ForeiEiFiaFEFthose .ro.erties abuttin• <br /> 16 Duke Forest, and that two designations of Transition Area be established - <br /> 17 Transition I and II. Area I would include that area previously designated <br /> 18 for urban expansion. Area II would include the extended area. <br /> 19 <br /> !O - - Within Area I, densities from one to five units per acre <br /> !1 would be permitted. Within Area II, densities, would be <br /> !2 limited to one unit per acre until such time as Area I was at <br /> ?3 least • 75% developed; - (The Planning Board 'clarified "75% <br /> !if developed" to mean "developed or subdivided for _ development <br /> . . . . <br /> 5 . - ., at densities of - one' ' to five units per acre" .' Development <br /> !6 refers to land coverage and not 75% of the .residential units <br /> Z7 possible. ) <br /> ZS , <br /> . •• .- <br /> . <br /> -.: - - . . : , 'The . Planning Board fuither ' recommends that Cairboro and <br /> 30 ) '' --- ' chapel - Hill. . provide at least' one seat' on - their Planning <br /> 2 Amk <br /> - <br /> 31 :-':-- '“ " Boards- for representatives from the Transition * Area ' in, their <br /> 32 . <br /> Towns' respective spheres of influence or areas • of <br /> 33 jurisdiction. <br /> 34 . <br /> . _ . . <br /> 35 All of the above would' be contingent upon Carrboro supplying <br /> 36 ' a binding agreement that it would not seek to extend water <br /> 37 ' — ' ' . ' and sewer lines into University Lake Watershed prior to <br /> 38 completion of the OWASA carrying capacity study. <br /> 39 •.. <br /> 40 • <br /> ' (2) That boundary designations delineating Transition and Rural <br /> 41 - ' ' Buffer boundaries be established. <br /> 42 _ . . , - <br /> 43 . • • <br /> ' - ; (3) -: That an ' ' exchange of Carrboro zoning jurisdiction in <br /> 44 University Lake Watershed for Orange County zoning <br /> 45 jurisdiction in the Bolin Creek Basin not be pursued further. <br /> 46 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 47 - . -.,.._ <br /> . <br /> 48 3 . DEER CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAN <br /> 49 Planner Greg Szymik presented for consideration of approval the <br /> 50 Preliminary Plan for Deer Crossing which is located on the south side of <br /> 51 Old Greensboro Road (SR 1005) in Bingham Township. Six lots are proposed <br /> 52 out of 12.3 acres. The property is zoned Agricultural-Residential. The <br /> 53 Land Use Plan designation is identical. The Planning Board recommended <br /> 54 approval. <br /> 55 •\ . . <br /> 56 Jul Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner. <br /> 57 Carey, to approve the Planning Board recommendation. <br /> _ . <br /> 58 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 59 - <br /> • .. , <br />