Agenda - 12-05-2016 - 6-a - Minutes

Browse Search

6 1 Trish McGuire presented several maps via PowerPoint. She reviewed the following 2 information: 3 4 Carrboro town staff along with County staff have been studying opportunities for development in 5 the NC Hwy 54 West corridor within Carrboro's extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) since this is one 6 of the few areas in or near the Town that are zoned for light manufacturing. Most of the 7 properties on the north side of Hwy 54 are split by Town and County jurisdictional boundaries. 8 Real estate professionals have indicated that this can be a barrier to development by potential 9 buyers of commercial properties. 10 11 The zoning of these parcels is also split with the portions in Carrboro's ETJ zoned Watershed 12 Manufacturing (WM-3) and the portions in County jurisdiction zoned Rural Buffer (RB). With 13 such disparate zoning and the associated limitations on impervious surface area in the 14 University Lake watershed, the development potential of these parcels is limited. Most of the 15 neighboring parcels split by the jurisdictional boundary in this area are zoned RB and WR 16 (Watershed Residential), zoning which mostly allows the same type and amount of 17 development activity to occur in either jurisdiction. Currently on these five properties, all aspects 18 of a commercial, manufacturing development have to be contained on the portion of the parcel 19 that lies within Carrboro's ETJ —about half of each lot. 20 21 The Town has received several inquiries about redevelopment opportunities for one of the 22 parcels. Another property owner has discussed with staff challenges associated with the 23 conditions described above. The complications associated with the split jurisdiction and zoning 24 have apparently proved to be a deterrent to the submittal of formal applications. The Board of 25 Aldermen has discussed the benefits of uniform jurisdiction and zoning for these parcels, which 26 could be achieved by an extension of the Town's ETJ to cover the parcels in full or by 27 encouraging owners to request voluntary annexation into the Town limits and is seeking the 28 Board of County Commissioners' perspective. 29 30 Information letters have been sent to the affected property owners regarding possible extension 31 of the Town's ETJ. The initial feedback from property owners is they would like to see an 32 expansion of existing uses that are allowed in the town's WM3 zoning district. Town staff will be 33 reviewing this for a possible land use ordinance amendment. 34 35 Expansion of the town's ETJ will require approval from the County Board of Commissioners. 36 The state statutes describe the procedural requirements that apply to the County and municipal 37 governments. These requirements are summarized below, with notes indicating which party has 38 responsibility for the action: 39 40 1. Extraterritorial area must be set by an ordinance adopted by the city governing board. 41 Newspaper notice, mailed notice and public hearing requirements apply (Town). 42 2. Approval of a request for the extension into any area where the county is enforcing 43 zoning, subdivision regulations, and the building code (County and Town). 44 3. Approvals, requests or agreements must be established by a formally adopted 45 resolution of the governing board (County and Town). 46 4. Adopted boundary map must be recorded with the register of deeds and the map 47 maintained permanently in the office of the city clerk (County and Town). 48 5. New zoning designation(s) must be applied to ETJ (Town)following procedures for 49 zoning amendments. The statues provide for a sixty-day transition period, during which 50 prior county zoning remains in place and enforceable.