Browse
Search
Minutes 09-29-2016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Minutes 09-29-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 8:37:10 AM
Creation date
11/16/2016 8:32:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/29/2016
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - 1-4 Joint Meeting Abstract BOCC, CHCCS, OCS
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 2 - Family Success Alliance
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 3 a - Maximum Supportable Impact Fee (MSIF)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 3 b - Historical Impact Fee Activity
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 3 c - School Impact Fee Collections Graph
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 3 d - School Impact Fee Expenditures
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 a - OCS Free and Reduced Lunch Eligibility
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 b - OCS 10-Year Student Ethnicity Comparison
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 c - OCS Legislative Class Size Impact and Teaching Hiring Update
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 d - CHCCS Demographic Changes
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 e - CHCCS Teacher Hiring Update
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 f - CHCCS Elementary Class Size Changes
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> • Overview <br /> o Impact Fees <br /> o Process for the Studies <br /> • Impact Fee Results (by System) <br /> o Methodologies <br /> o Levels of Service and Costs <br /> o Maximum Supportable Amounts <br /> • Q & A <br /> TischlerBise, Inc.: <br /> • National Practice <br /> • Impact Fees (850+) <br /> • Fiscal Impact Evaluations (700+) <br /> • Infrastructure Needs & Revenue Strategies <br /> • Public and Private Sector Experience* <br /> Impact Fees <br /> The purpose is to: <br /> ". . . Help defray the costs to the County of constructing certain capital improvements, the <br /> need for which is created in substantial part by the new development that takes place within <br /> the County." <br /> • Represent new growth's fair share of the cost for capital facility needs <br /> • Used for capacity expansions <br /> • Not a revenue raising mechanism but a way to provide growth-related infrastructure <br /> • Three requirements must be met: <br /> o Impact: Growth is generating need for infrastructure <br /> o Benefit: Timing of improvements; accounting and expenditure controls <br /> o Proportionality: Fair share of cost <br /> Process for Study <br /> • Interview key staff <br /> • Analyze demographic data <br /> • Consider methodologies and determine levels of service <br /> • Determine capital costs <br /> • Evaluate inclusion of credits <br /> • Determine maximum supportable fee amounts for each school system <br /> • Staff review <br /> • Presentations to the public <br /> • Decision by elected officials <br /> Methodologies <br /> • Cost Recovery (past) <br /> o Oversized and unique facilities <br /> • Incremental Expansion (present) <br /> o Formula-based approach documents level-of-service with both quantitative and <br /> qualitative measures; common for schools <br /> • Plan-Based (future) <br /> o Common for utilities but can also be used for other public facilities with non- <br /> impact fee funding (e.g., roads) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.