Browse
Search
Minutes 09-29-2016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Minutes 09-29-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 8:37:10 AM
Creation date
11/16/2016 8:32:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/29/2016
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - 1-4 Joint Meeting Abstract BOCC, CHCCS, OCS
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 2 - Family Success Alliance
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 3 a - Maximum Supportable Impact Fee (MSIF)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 3 b - Historical Impact Fee Activity
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 3 c - School Impact Fee Collections Graph
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 3 d - School Impact Fee Expenditures
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 a - OCS Free and Reduced Lunch Eligibility
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 b - OCS 10-Year Student Ethnicity Comparison
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 c - OCS Legislative Class Size Impact and Teaching Hiring Update
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 d - CHCCS Demographic Changes
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 e - CHCCS Teacher Hiring Update
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
Agenda - 09-29-2016 - ATTACHMENT 4 f - CHCCS Elementary Class Size Changes
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-29-2016 - School Boards
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> consultant on September 1 because it was discovered that a portion of Appendix A was <br /> missing. <br /> School impact fees are fees charged to help defray the public costs of new development. The <br /> fee is charged once to all new residential development in both school districts. Fees charged <br /> must be proportional to the actual impact caused which is the reason a technical study is <br /> completed; the data-based study determines the proportional impact of housing types and the <br /> "maximum supportable impact fee" (MSIF) that can be charged for each type of housing. <br /> Proceeds from school impact fees can be used only to increase student membership capacity <br /> (e.g., Capital Facilities — new or expanded school buildings) in the school district in which the <br /> fee was collected. School impact fee proceeds cannot be used to fund operations. <br /> School impact fees were last updated in 2008 and were adopted to increase each year over <br /> four years, with the last increase effective January 1, 2012. The final increase raised the fee to <br /> 60% of the MSIF, as calculated in 2008. <br /> The recently completed studies disaggregate dwelling types by the number of bedrooms a unit <br /> contains and also break out smaller sized (less than 800 square feet) detached units. <br /> Additionally, the studies include information on Age Restricted Units. Attachment 3a shows the <br /> MSIF at various percentage levels. It should be noted that the adopted percentage of MSIF <br /> must be the same for all housing types (e.g., fees cannot be adopted at 40% MSIF for one <br /> housing type and 60% MSIF for a different housing type). <br /> Since 1995, Orange County has offered an impact fee reimbursement program for school <br /> impact fees paid on affordable housing units. From FY09-10 through FY15-16, $606,318 in <br /> collected impact fees was reimbursed for the 77 affordable single-family housing units and one <br /> apartment building containing 6 affordable multi-family units constructed in that time period. <br /> Orange County Planning staff will hold a public information meeting on September 26 at 6:00 <br /> p.m. at the Whitted Meeting Facility in Hillsborough. A representative from the consulting firm <br /> will attend the joint School Boards/BOCC meeting on September 29 to present the results of <br /> the study and address technical questions/comments on the reports. <br /> A BOCC public hearing on potential updates to school impact fee levels has been scheduled <br /> for October 4. <br /> Possible options for updated fee levels include: <br /> 1. As calculated, adopting at some percentage of the MSIF. <br /> 2. Collapsing the Single Family Detached category in the Orange County Schools district <br /> (due to an unexpected result in this category), charging the "Average" for this housing <br /> type in this district, charging fees as calculated for other housing types, and <br /> adopting at some percentage of the MSIF. <br /> 3. Collapsing all housing type categories in both or either school districts, charging the <br /> "Average" calculation by housing type, and adopting at some percentage of the MSIF. a. <br /> Note for this option: Accessory dwelling units (e.g., granny flats) are included in the <br /> multi-family category (0-2 bedrooms) so setting the fee for the "average" calculation may <br /> result in an increase for accessory dwelling units, depending on the percentage of MSIF <br /> chosen. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.