Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-30-2007-e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 04-30-2007
>
Agenda - 04-30-2007-e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 12:26:51 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:42:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/30/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
e
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070430
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
on the capital side "are tremendous." The County is either going to pay for the needed <br />expanded school capacity -another seven million dollars for the next elementary school, <br />for example - or, under SAPFO, developers are not going to be allowed to build until the <br />school is available. Mr. Link said that he was not taking a stance on the two-cent <br />proposal, but he urged the group to note that under the proposal those who live in the <br />OCS are going to pay a lot more in taxes. "It's simple math and there is no way around <br />it," he said. <br />Dr. Kelley said that group members were "pretty close on the major points:' Impact fees <br />need to be reviewed, and it is good that the Commissioners are doing that, he said. The <br />real estate transfer tax is a great idea. And it really comes down to selling the community <br />on raising the ad valorem tax. My impression is that the majority of the people in the city <br />district support fully funding the city schools, he said. To the extent that raising ad <br />valorem tax will over-fund the city district, we could reduce the district tax. <br />There is an almost proportionality of the tax base and students across the two districts, <br />Dr. Kelley added. The situation is not equal, and I now understand why a district tax in <br />the County would not be a good solution, he said. <br />Ms. Bedford noted that a nine cent increase in the ad valorem tax can be sold by <br />explaining that the state board of education has passed new rules regarding testing. Kids <br />who do not pass end of year exams will not graduate. And the economy has changed: <br />There are no jobs for kids without a diploma. With our current funding -even as we <br />move funds to address the needs of minority students, students taking English as a <br />Second Language, and special ed. students - we need more dollars. Although we aze <br />closing the performance gap at the elementary level, and each district has different needs, <br />we still have a lot of work to do at the middle and high school levels that requires time <br />and funding. Education is the key, she said, for farmers' children and for the children <br />living within the city district. I don't think its fair that military service is the only option <br />for people who want a ticket out of poverty. We need education, and I don't think it will <br />be hard to sell the increase. <br />Dr. Hamilton agreed that it would not be hard to sell an increase in the ad valorem tax. <br />City district residents value education, she said. We can meet both school districts' needs <br />this way, without having to eliminate the district tax. <br />Next 1Vleeting <br />Mr. Copeland asked Commissioners Foushee and Gordon if they were getting what they <br />needed from today's discussions, and if a second work group meeting were needed. <br />Commissioner Foushee~ said that the next round of discussions should focus on solutions, <br />and not be bogged down by the different positions across the two school districts with <br />respect to the district tax. She is also curious to know what each district thinks about the <br />Manager's proposal for funcling lazge ticket operational items outside of the per pupil <br />funding stream. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.