Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-30-2007-d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 04-30-2007
>
Agenda - 04-30-2007-d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 9:16:23 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:42:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/30/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070430
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />The Chapel Hill- Carrboro Schools rely on the supplemental; school district tax <br />in addition to the monthly County appropriation. The supplemental tax is <br />approximately 113 of their local current expense fund revenues and is received <br />primarily.during the months of January and February. Because of this reliance <br />on the district tax and again, using the County's 82 mini mum standard as ar gacige, <br />a 5.52 fund balance level should be adequate for the Chapel Hill - Carrboro Schools. <br />In addition to my own analyses of the above percentages, I have discussed the <br />fund balance level appropriate fbr school systems with others in state and <br />local goverameat who are familiar with school-and county finances. The consensus <br />was that the fund balance level for school systems should be somewhat lower than <br />that of the County's 82 standard and that a system, relying on a supplemental tax <br />would need,a higher level than otherwise necessary. <br />Based on my analyses -and discussions, I recoammend that the following policies <br />be established: <br />L. Orange County Schools begin each.'£iscal year, to the extent possible, <br />with fund balance available but unappropriated in the local current <br />expense fund that is equal to na-more than 2.7% of the budgeted <br />expenditures in that fund for that year, and; <br />2. Chapel Hill- Carrboro Schools begin each fiscal year, to the extent <br />possible, with a fund balance available but uaapproptiat he <br />local current expense fund that is equal to ao more that 5.52 o the, <br />budgeted expenditures in that fund for that year.- <br />It must be noted that, based on'the local current expense budgets as. originally <br />adopted for 1985 -86, Orange County. Schools fund balance level was approximately <br />$86,000 short of the level• recommended in this draft,polidy. Also, Chapel 114 11 <br />Schools fund balance level was approximately $204,000 short of the <br />recommended level. Considering the federal cut -back in assistance to local <br />governments, the County should not be expected to build -up the school systems <br />fund balance levels in one fiscal years I rec end "that this be. accomplished <br />gradually over a period of several fiscal years. <br />V <br />r' <br />r <br />The Chapel Hill- Carrboro Schools rely on the supplemental; school district tax <br />in addition to the monthly County appropriation. The supplemental tax is <br />approximately 113 of their local current expense fund revenues and is received <br />primarily.during the months of January and February. Because of this reliance <br />on the district tax and again, using the County's 82 mini mum standard as ar gacige, <br />a 5.52 fund balance level should be adequate for the Chapel Hill - Carrboro Schools. <br />In addition to my own analyses of the above percentages, I have discussed the <br />fund balance level appropriate fbr school systems with others in state and <br />local goverameat who are familiar with school-and county finances. The consensus <br />was that the fund balance level for school systems should be somewhat lower than <br />that of the County's 82 standard and that a system, relying on a supplemental tax <br />would need,a higher level than otherwise necessary. <br />Based on my analyses -and discussions, I recoammend that the following policies <br />be established: <br />L. Orange County Schools begin each.'£iscal year, to the extent possible, <br />with fund balance available but unappropriated in the local current <br />expense fund that is equal to na-more than 2.7% of the budgeted <br />expenditures in that fund for that year, and; <br />2. Chapel Hill- Carrboro Schools begin each fiscal year, to the extent <br />possible, with a fund balance available but uaapproptiat he <br />local current expense fund that is equal to ao more that 5.52 o the, <br />budgeted expenditures in that fund for that year.- <br />It must be noted that, based on'the local current expense budgets as. originally <br />adopted for 1985 -86, Orange County. Schools fund balance level was approximately <br />$86,000 short of the level• recommended in this draft,polidy. Also, Chapel 114 11 <br />Schools fund balance level was approximately $204,000 short of the <br />recommended level. Considering the federal cut -back in assistance to local <br />governments, the County should not be expected to build -up the school systems <br />fund balance levels in one fiscal years I rec end "that this be. accomplished <br />gradually over a period of several fiscal years. <br />V <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.