Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-30-2007-a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 04-30-2007
>
Agenda - 04-30-2007-a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 12:29:28 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:41:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/30/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070430
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a) Innovative Development Tools <br />In North Carolina, school districts have a variety of options for constructing <br />schools: <br />^ General Statute 143-128 (a1) includes (1) Separate Prime Bidding, <br />(2) Single Prime Bidding, and (3) Dual Bidding <br />^ General Statute 143-64.31 provides for Construction Management <br />at Risk <br />^ General Statute 143-135.26(9) provides for alternative contracting <br />methods <br />^ Senate Bill 2009 (Senate Law 2006-232) provides for capital leases <br />of school buildings and school facilities <br />Both the Construction Manager at Risk and the capital lease options allow <br />school districts flexibility in setting actual project cost. Examples of <br />potential benefits associated with these options include: <br />^ Contract. Negotiation -School Boards and staffs become integral <br />partners within the design build teams that includes the architect <br />and the contractor. This team develops a maximum project cost, in <br />a transparent manner, throughout all areas of the design and <br />development process thereby controlling these costs within the <br />design phase. <br />^ Flexibility -While school systems had the statutory authority to <br />lease facilities in the past, with the ratification of Senate Bill 2009 in <br />2006, through public-private partnerships between Boards of <br />Education and contractors, school districts now have opportunities <br />for to enter into "build-to-suit" contracts. School districts have <br />opportunities to identify where the district needs schools, and to <br />provide design, programming and construction specifications to the <br />developer. <br />^ Future Maintenance of Facility - In accordance with Senate Bill <br />2009, as part of contract negotiation, responsibility for future facility <br />maintenance/repairs and energy usage guarantees can be <br />assigned to the developer and not the school system. <br />^ Ownership -Per Senate Bill 2009, transfer of ownership of the <br />leased property may occur at the end of the lease term or <br />ownership may stay with the developer. <br />^ Time Savings -Contract negotiations offered through public-private <br />partnerships can potentially be conducted more quickly than more <br />traditional public methods. While entities may not realize major <br />cost savings in building costs, there may be savings attributed to <br />beating inflation. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.