Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - 7-a - School Impact Fee Updates
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - 7-a - School Impact Fee Updates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 2:55:26 PM
Creation date
11/11/2016 8:26:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/15/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-15-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
ORD-2016-034 Ordinance Amending Chapter 30, Article II - Educational Facilities Impact Fee of the OC Code of Ordinances
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> redeveloped into a project that contains 250 new units would pay impact fees only on the 50 <br /> additional units). <br /> The Board of County Commissioners has extensively discussed the results of the 2016 studies <br /> and possible fee updates at four meetings since September. Meeting materials and videos of <br /> the meetings are posted at: <br /> http://www.orangecountync.gov/departments/board of county commissioners/index.php <br /> Meeting dates were: <br /> • September 6, 2016 <br /> • September 29, 2016 <br /> • October 4, 2016 <br /> • October 18, 2016 <br /> In the interest of keeping this agenda item as short as possible, all available previous <br /> information is not included with this abstract but is available to interested persons who view the <br /> previous meeting materials and videos. Additionally, the full studies and other information are <br /> posted at: <br /> http://www.orangecountync.gov/departments/planning and inspections/current interest project <br /> s.php <br /> At the October 18 meeting, the Board voted (5-2) on the preference for charging school impact <br /> fees based on bedroom counts, when applicable. The Board also deferred an adoption decision <br /> to give staff time to meet with representatives of three interested groups (the Homebuilders <br /> Association of Durham, Orange, and Chatham Counties; the Triangle Apartment Association; <br /> and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce) who spoke at the meeting and also to <br /> conduct an additional breakeven analysis based on different assumptions from the analysis that <br /> was completed for the October 18 meeting. <br /> County staff met with representatives of various organizations on October 26 and the group sent <br /> an email with their comments on November 1. The e-mail and staff responses are included in <br /> Attachment 4. Some of the ideas presented by the stakeholders have been incorporated into <br /> the potential ordinances in Attachments 2 and 3. <br /> Details of the breakeven analyses are included in Attachment 1. The analyses differ in the <br /> multi-family bedroom split projections as follows: <br /> • A 50/50 multi-family bedroom split (0-2 bedrooms/3+ bedrooms) yields a breakeven point <br /> of 37% of the MSIF. Note that some stakeholders who attended the meeting on October <br /> 26 have indicated this bedroom split is not likely, particularly in the Chapel Hill — Carrboro <br /> district; expectation that more 0-2 bedroom units will be constructed than 3+ bedroom <br /> units. <br /> • A 75/25 multi-family bedroom split (0-2 bedrooms/3+ bedrooms) yields a breakeven point <br /> of 43% of the MSIF. Note that some stakeholders have indicated this bedroom split may <br /> still be on the high side for 3+ bedroom units. Staff notes that if this indication is correct, <br /> the starting point of the MSIF would need to be higher if the County wishes to <br /> "breakeven" on school impact fee collections the first year. <br /> The breakeven analyses are based on the construction assumptions included in Attachment 1. <br /> If actual construction differs significantly from assumptions, actual impact fee amounts collected <br /> would be different (either higher or lower, depending on actual construction activity). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.