Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 11:32:50 AM
Creation date
11/11/2016 8:26:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/15/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-15-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> 1 o Levels of Service and Costs <br /> 2 o Maximum Supportable Amounts <br /> 3 • Q & A <br /> 4 <br /> 5 TischlerBise, Inc.: <br /> 6 • National Practice <br /> 7 • Impact Fees (850+) <br /> 8 • Fiscal Impact Evaluations (700+) <br /> 9 • Infrastructure Needs & Revenue Strategies <br /> 10 • Public and Private Sector Experience* <br /> 11 Impact Fees <br /> 12 The purpose is to: <br /> 13 ". . . Help defray the costs to the County of constructing certain capital improvements, the need <br /> 14 for which is created in substantial part by the new development that takes place within the <br /> 15 County." <br /> 16 <br /> 17 • Represent new growth's fair share of the cost for capital facility needs <br /> 18 • Used for capacity expansions <br /> 19 • Not a revenue raising mechanism but a way to provide growth-related infrastructure <br /> 20 • Three requirements must be met: <br /> 21 o Impact: Growth is generating need for infrastructure <br /> 22 o Benefit: Timing of improvements; accounting and expenditure controls <br /> 23 o Proportionality: Fair share of cost <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Process for Study <br /> 26 • Interview key staff <br /> 27 • Analyze demographic data <br /> 28 • Consider methodologies and determine levels of service <br /> 29 • Determine capital costs <br /> 30 • Evaluate inclusion of credits <br /> 31 • Determine maximum supportable fee amounts for each school system <br /> 32 • Staff review <br /> 33 • Presentations to the public <br /> 34 • Decision by elected officials <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Methodologies <br /> 37 • Cost Recovery (past) <br /> 38 o Oversized and unique facilities <br /> 39 • Incremental Expansion (present) <br /> 40 o Formula-based approach documents level-of-service with both quantitative and <br /> 41 qualitative measures; common for schools <br /> 42 • Plan-Based (future) <br /> 43 o Common for utilities but can also be used for other public facilities with non- <br /> 44 impact fee funding (e.g., roads) <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Impact Fee Formula Overview (graph) <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Impact Fee Methodolgy (flow chart) <br /> 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.