Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 11:32:50 AM
Creation date
11/11/2016 8:26:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/15/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-15-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> 1 • Calculate Cost per Student <br /> 2 • Calculate Maximum Supportable Impact Fee, using the above as the input variables <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Orange County Schools — Maximum Supportable Impact Fee (chart) <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Chapel Hill — Carrboro Schools — Maximum Supportable Impact Fee (chart) <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Orange County Schools - MSIF Percentages (chart) <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Chapel Hill — Carrboro Schools — MSIF Percentages (chart) <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Possible Options <br /> 13 • As calculated, by bedroom count (if applicable), adopting at some percentage of the <br /> 14 MSIF. <br /> 15 • Collapsing the Single Family Detached category in the Orange County Schools district <br /> 16 (due to an unexpected result in this category), charging the "Average"for this housing <br /> 17 type in this district, charging fees as calculated for other housing types, and adopting at <br /> 18 some percentage of the MSIF. <br /> 19 • Collapsing all housing type categories in both or either school districts, charging the <br /> 20 "Average" calculation by housing type, and adopting at some percentage of the MSIF. <br /> 21 • Options 1-3 can also be implemented by increasing the percentage of MSIF over a <br /> 22 period of time (e.g., adopt at x% effective 2017, y% effective 2018, and z% effective <br /> 23 2019). <br /> 24 <br /> 25 As Calculated, by Bedroom Counts (if Applicable) -(OCS) (chart) <br /> 26 <br /> 27 As Calculated, by Bedroom Counts (if Applicable) —(CHCCS) (chart) <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Collapse Single Family Detached in OCS Only (chart) <br /> 30 • CHCCS remains "as calculated, by bedroom counts, if applicable" <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Collapse All Housing Types to "Average" —OCS (chart) <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Collapse All Housing Types to "Average" —CHCCS (chart) <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Educational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance <br /> 37 • Add definitions for the various housing types. <br /> 38 • Add language in Section 30-33 that would require age restricted units that do not remain <br /> 39 age restricted for at least 20 years be required to pay the difference between the age <br /> 40 restricted fee paid and the non-age-restricted fee in effect at the time a unit is no longer <br /> 41 age restricted. <br /> 42 • Add language in Section 30-35(e) clarifying under what conditions a refund would be <br /> 43 issued if impact fees were reduced for a particular housing unit type. <br /> 44 • Add language in Section 30-38 to recognize conditional zoning, which was adopted in <br /> 45 2011 when the UDO was adopted. <br /> 46 • Impact fee levels in Section 30-33 to be determined after public hearing <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Additional Information <br /> 49 • Attachment 6: <br /> 50 o Average historical residential unit growth <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.