Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-15-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 11:32:50 AM
Creation date
11/11/2016 8:26:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/15/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-15-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 b. Matters on the Printed Agenda <br /> 3 (These matters will be considered when the Board addresses that item on the agenda <br /> 4 below.) <br /> 5 <br /> 6 3. Announcements and Petitions by Board Members <br /> 7 Commissioner Pelissier had no announcements or petitions. <br /> 8 Commissioner Jacobs asked the Manager if documentation for agenda items could be <br /> 9 placed behind the abstract to review before the meeting, whether it is a work session or regular <br /> 10 meeting. <br /> 11 Commissioner Jacobs said he would like to have a policy requiring advisory boards to <br /> 12 have meetings in rooms large enough to accommodate the public. <br /> 13 Commissioner Rich met with Dan May from the Arts Center and discussed more <br /> 14 collaboration between the art commissions. She asked if an update could be provided <br /> 15 regarding progress on this matter in the coming months. <br /> 16 Commissioner Dorosin said in the past the County has made ad hoc efforts to buy or <br /> 17 hire locally for County related contracting or business. He said given the conversation recently <br /> 18 about asking contractors to pay a living wage, etc., he would like a formalized policy for a local <br /> 19 purchasing priority. <br /> 20 Commissioner Jacobs said this has been brought up before in an ad hoc way, and <br /> 21 putting it in writing is overdue. <br /> 22 Commissioner Rich said there has been a resolution regarding food for events and <br /> 23 expressed support for this petition. <br /> 24 Commissioner Price said Indigenous People's Day is on Monday, October 10, and the <br /> 25 Town of Chapel Hill has some activities planned. <br /> 26 Commissioner Price said she attended an exciting workshop today about Smart Cities, <br /> 27 and there is an opportunity for cities and counties to get assistance to look at opportunities for <br /> 28 data and analytics. She said she will share this information with the Manager to research. <br /> 29 Commissioner Burroughs had no announcements or petitions. <br /> 30 Chair McKee asked if a discussion item to remove imminent domain, as related to the <br /> 31 Mountain to Sea Trail (MTS), could be brought back to the Board. <br /> 32 Chair McKee said the travel policy that the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) <br /> 33 approved does not align with the one that the ABC Board has written, and he asked for the ABC <br /> 34 Board policy to be brought back at the next regular BOCC meeting for further discussion. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 4. Proclamations/ Resolutions/ Special Presentations <br /> 37 None <br /> 38 <br /> 39 5. Public Hearings <br /> 40 <br /> 41 a. School Impact Fee Updates <br /> 42 The Board considered: 1. Conducting a public hearing on potential updates to current <br /> 43 school impact fee levels and amendments to the General Code of Ordinances — Educational <br /> 44 Facilities Impact Fees; 2. Discussing the topic as desired; 3. Closing the public hearing; 4. <br /> 45 Directing the consultant, TischlerBise, to finalize the draft school impact fee studies; and 5. <br /> 46 Directing staff to bring back amendments to the Code of General Ordinances — Educational <br /> 47 Facilities Impact Fees for adoption consideration on October 18, 2016. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 BACKGROUND: On September 6, 2016 the Board of County Commissioners received draft <br /> 50 school impact fee studies for both school districts that had been completed by TischlerBise, a <br /> 51 consulting firm retained by the County. School impact fees are fees charged to help defray the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.