Orange County NC Website
13 <br /> 1 • Collapsing all housing type categories in both or either school districts, charging the <br /> 2 "Average" calculation by housing type, and adopting at some percentage of the MSIF. <br /> 3 • Options 1-3 can also be implemented by increasing the percentage of MSIF over a <br /> 4 period of time (e.g., adopt at x% effective 2017, y% effective 2018, and z% effective <br /> 5 2019). <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Upcoming Meetings <br /> 8 • Joint Board of County Commissioners/ School Boards Meeting — Sep. 29 <br /> 9 • Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing on October 4 beginning at 7:00 p.m. at <br /> 10 the Whitted Meeting Facility <br /> 11 • Possible adoption of updated fees at October 18 Board of County Commissioners <br /> 12 Meeting <br /> 13 Joal Broun referred to the new legislation that requires smaller K-3 class sizes, and <br /> 14 asked if there is a plan to factor in the additional space that will be needed to accommodate this <br /> 15 legislation. <br /> 16 Craig Benedict said that would have to be analyzed. He said if the same square <br /> 17 footage, at the same cost, provides less capacity, then there will be a higher cost per seat. He <br /> 18 said school construction standards will also be reviewed, as well as how the legislation would <br /> 19 affect school construction costs. <br /> 20 Joal Broun asked if this would be discussed before the Board of County Commissioners <br /> 21 decides on the impact fee. <br /> 22 Craig Benedict said the Planning Department could work with the Finance Department <br /> 23 and both school districts to see what the affects would be. <br /> 24 Commissioner Dorosin thanked the consultant, and said this was not supposed to be a <br /> 25 cross-examination. He said there are new board members on both Boards, and there are high <br /> 26 emotions and history with this issue, but her work is appreciated. <br /> 27 Commissioner Jacobs referred to Joal Broun's comment, and said if the County has to <br /> 28 anticipate another unfunded mandate from the State, then the County should anticipate it. He <br /> 29 said such litigation may pre-dispose the Board of County Commissioners to picking a higher <br /> 30 number with which to start. He said he would recommend phasing in the impact fees. <br /> 31 Commissioner Price asked if an extensive addition is built onto a mill home, which are <br /> 32 historic preservation homes, would it be considered for impact fees. <br /> 33 Craig Benedict said existing homes are grandfathered in, but if children are living in <br /> 34 these houses they will be captured in future analysis. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 4. Discussion of School Related Topics <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools <br /> 39 Todd LoFrese referred to page 20 in the BOCC packet, and reviewed the following <br /> 40 information about CHCCS: <br /> 41 <br /> 42 • Demographic Challenges <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Demographic Changes <br /> 45 2000 2005 2010 2015 <br /> Lunch 17% 18% 25% 31% <br /> Asian 9% 12% 15% 15% <br /> Black 16% 14% 13% 11% <br /> Hispanic 5% 9% 11% 16% <br /> Multi 3% 5% 6% 6% <br />