Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-20-94 - X-A
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 12-20-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 12-20-94 - X-A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2016 3:07:26 PM
Creation date
11/9/2016 9:04:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/20/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
X-A
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> • Replacement of a building or structure or mobile home with a new building or structure <br /> or mobile home of the same dwelling type. <br /> • Accessory buildings and structures, including, but not limited to,garages, decks, storage <br /> buildings, and similar structures,provided they are not used for residential purposes. <br /> • Temporary buildings and structures,provided they are not used for residential purposes. <br /> However, public school impact fees shall not be levied in the following cases: <br /> o A mobile home being used to provide custodial care under the provisions of an <br /> approved Special Use Permit. <br /> o A mobile home being used as a temporary residential dwelling during the <br /> installation of a replacement mobile home or the construction of a stick-built <br /> dwelling unit. <br /> One of the difficult aspects of administering the impact fee ordinance involved when and when not <br /> to grant exceptions for "replacement" units. Soon after the ordinance became effective, questions arose <br /> such as the following: <br /> • A farm house existed on the property 20 years ago. Is an impact fee required? <br /> • A mobile home existed on the property two years ago. Is a fee required? <br /> Because of the number of such questions, the following interim policy was employed: <br /> If a dwelling unit (or mobile home) is being placed on a lot (or mobile home space) which has <br /> been vacant for one year or less, it is permissible to issue a building permit without charging <br /> impact fees.If the situation involves a lot(or mobile home space)which has been vacant for more <br /> than one year, the applicant must submit a letter which explains his/her situation and why the <br /> lot (space) has been vacant for an extended period of time. The letter, along with the completed <br /> building permit application, must be submitted to the Planning Director for review. Following <br /> consultation with the County Manager and the County Attorney, a decision will be rendered <br /> regarding the request. <br /> An acceptable reason for excepting impact fees for spaces or lots which have been vacant for more <br /> than a year includes the inability of the mobile home park owner to locate homes on spaces due <br /> to a County or State prohibition resulting from a failing septic system or contaminated well. This <br /> situation may include the time involved to extend public water and sewer service to the site or the <br /> installation of a new septic and/or well system. <br /> The above policy was initially drafted in August, 1993. It was revised again in October, 1993, to <br /> add the provision regarding failing septic systems and contaminated wells. Since the policy was instituted, <br /> 13 exception requests have been handled involving 61 dwellings. A summary of the requests and actions <br /> taken is as shown on the following page. <br /> Of all the exception requests considered to date, the most time consuming to explain and/or <br /> process have been those associated with mobile home parks. Several owners have cited other reasons for <br /> controlling the flow of units in and out of a park(other than failing septic systems). One reason cited more <br /> than any other was the desire to locate desirable tenants in the parks. The owners noted that it is time <br /> consuming as well as expensive to remove undesirable tenants, and, once removed, they have been <br /> Annual Report 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.