Agenda - 11-30-94 - C-2 (a,b,c) - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

a) Dish antennas would be allowed on the ground or on roof-tops. If on the ground, landscape screening would be required. If on the roof, screening would be accomplished through architectural design of the roof. In both cases, visibility of the antennas would be minimized. b) Tower antennas would be allowed on the ground or on roof-tops, with a height limit of 15 feet. Higher towers would require approval of a Special Use Permit. Revisions to Section 3.4(Service and Storage)and 3.1 (Architectural Design) have been prepared to address this recommendation. (Attachments 5 and 6) 6. Use a different means of identifying high water use. The Design Manual currently requires approval of a Special Use Permit or Planned Development if water use exceeds an industry average. The Work Group recommended that a specific number, in terms of gallons per day, be used to define the limit above which approval by the Board of Commissioners would be required. The Town and County staffs recommend a threshold of 30,000 gallons per day, which is approximately 1% of the daily capacity of the existing Hillsborough wastewater treatment plant. Flynt Industries, which uses approximately 500,000 gallons per day,is the only existing industry served by Hillsborough which exceeds the proposed threshold. A proposed revision to Section 2.4 (Environmental Factors) is included to implement this recommendation. (Attachment 7) B. Options to Address Issues on Which Consensus was not Reached The Work Group did not reach consensus on whether or not water and sewer service should be extended to serve the south side of I-40. The southernmost boundary of any sewer service from Hillsborough would be the ridgeline forming the boundary of the Cates Creek drainage basin. The Work Group identified the following options and possibilities: 1. Limit public water and sewer service to the north side of I-40, delaying extensions to the area south of I-40 until specified development *AN* are met. Development eh lds discussed by the Work Group included specifying a percentage of area within the remainder of the EDD which must be developed or planned, or specifying a time period which must pass, after which the issue could be revisited. In the interim, allow alternative wastewater disposal systems on the south side of I-40. Discussion of the Work Group on this issue focused to a great extent on the perception held by some citizens that the extension of public services to the south side of 1-40 would create development pressure at the intersection of I-40 and New Hope Church Road, which may result in extension of water and sewer service from OWASA through the Rural Buffer. Terms of the Joint Planning Agreement between Orange County, Chapel Hill and Carrboro, and the Orange County Water and Sewer Policy currently prohibit extensions into the Rural Buffer except as necessary to address a public health emergency or serve an essential public service, such as a school. Concern was expressed that future development pressure in or near the Rural Buffer could result in changes to the Agreement which could compromise the Rural Buffer.