Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-12-2007-4
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 04-12-2007
>
Agenda - 04-12-2007-4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:47:13 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:36:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/12/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070412
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br />Option # 3: County establishes a percentage of the entire utility extension <br />project cost plus a cap per lot that it will pay to reduce the final <br />assessment amount for each impacted resident/property owner <br />Process Description: <br />This option is modeled on the policy adopted by the Town of Chapel Hill in September <br />1988 for sewer extensions for existing neighborhoods within the Town limits. The <br />Town's assistance level is 20% with a cap of $4,500 per lot. OWASA does not assess for <br />costs covered by the Town. <br />After a project is complete, the OWASA Board of Directors would determine the amount <br />of assessments and the list of properties that are assessed. Pre lot assessments are <br />calculated as actual costs of the completed project, less the OWASA and Town support <br />as noted, divided by the number of benefiting lots. (Note: Under OWASA Board <br />adopted policies, OWASA does not assess for engineering expenses up to 15 per cent of <br />project costs or for legal expenses up to 5 per cent of project cost.) <br />Based on this model, the BOCC would exclude ("forgive") a certain percentage of the <br />entire assessment project cost, thereby decreasing the assessment charge for every <br />resident/property owner regardless of economic status. In addition, the BOCC would <br />provide ("absorb") a fixed cap per lot to further buy-down the individual assessment. <br />Advanta~es• <br />- Flexible since the BOCC decides on the overall project "discount" and per <br />property "cap" that deternne the subsidy <br />- Easy to articulate and defend within mixed income populations <br />- Relief not reliant upon personal economic variables or the need to self-identify <br />- Builds on notions of community "participation" and "partnership" <br />Disadvanta~es• <br />- Reduces the amount of revenue returned for reinvestment <br />- Income-neutral way to provide assessment relief <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.