Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-2016 - 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendments – Hillsborough Economic Development District
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 11-01-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-01-2016 - 5-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Amendments – Hillsborough Economic Development District
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2016 7:46:28 AM
Creation date
10/28/2016 7:12:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes 11-01-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
60 <br /> 55 Tony Blake: Ok because the first four on the list seem to run counter to some of the initiatives that we've had to <br /> 56 increase agriculture and that sort of thing. <br /> 57 <br /> 58 Perdita Holtz: But if you actually look at the table of permitted uses, it starts on page 32, when you have food <br /> 59 manufacturing and there are still a lot of agricultural product manufacturing that would still be allowed. <br /> 60 <br /> 61 Tony Blake: Ok. <br /> 62 <br /> 63 Craig Benedict: Let me just add on to that.As Perdita said you'll see more lists uses and it'll be organized by certain <br /> 64 sectors of the NAICS Code and in there it'll be very specific. I do work with Steve Brantley on a regular basis and <br /> 65 we've had titles in there before like Light Manufacturing and they said, "What's that?" so now there will probably be <br /> 66 50 listings of what that means. But we can have it as a document that can be put all together and will be part of the <br /> 67 code. The specificity, although it adds 40 pages or so, is going to be helpful. And let's say there is a use that we <br /> 68 want to pop back in there; we have to be flexible enough to be able to do that. This was part of the Commissioners <br /> 69 request from the September meeting, to develop consistency across the EDDs. <br /> 70 <br /> 71 Lisa Stuckey: I have one little question. Wasn't one of the concerns the asphalt plant? Is that covered with coal <br /> 72 product? <br /> 73 <br /> 74 Perdita Holtz:Yes. It is. It's like cement and concrete. It's listed as a subcategory to that main category. <br /> 75 <br /> 76 Lisa Stuckey: Ok. I thought it was probably petroleum. <br /> 77 <br /> 78 Kim Piracci:What do these all have in common? <br /> 79 <br /> 80 Lisa Stuckey: Noxious. <br /> 81 <br /> 82 Kim Piracci:The animal food manufacturing is noxious? <br /> 83 <br /> 84 Perdita Holtz: When we looked at the sub sector 311 food manufacturing and there are nine different uses under <br /> 85 there and animal food manufacturing is one of them. Grain, sugar and confectionary product, vegetable and fruit <br /> 86 preserving, specialty food manufacturing, dairy product manufacturing, animal slaughtering and processing, seafood <br /> 87 product preparation and packaging, bakeries and tortilla manufacturing and other food manufacturing are the nine <br /> 88 subcategories and most of those would be allowed. Animal food manufacturing we would take out because they do <br /> 89 tend to have smells associated with them. <br /> 90 <br /> 91 Craig Benedict: And the other similarity... We have performance standards for a lot of uses that were permitted by <br /> 92 right. Fumes, vibration, dust, noise, and light. So you'll see a lot of similarities here that could be some sort of odor or <br /> 93 fumes and we didn't have them specifically prohibited and now we're being more specific. <br /> 94 <br /> 95 Tony Blake:Curtis Bane had a question, I believe. <br /> 96 <br /> 97 Curtis Bane:What's the impact fee going to be on these businesses? <br /> 98 <br /> 99 Perdita Holtz:What kind of impact fee? <br /> 100 <br /> 101 Curtis Bane:There's not going to be an impact fee for these? <br /> 102 <br /> 103 Perdita Holtz: Orange County charges school impact fees but only new residential construction pays school impact <br /> 104 fees because residential is what causes school impacts. <br /> 105 <br /> 106 Craig Benedict: So there'll be no impact fees on any non-residential uses in the County. <br /> 107 <br /> 108 Curtis Bane:What about buffer zoning? <br /> 109 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.