Orange County NC Website
59 <br /> Attachment 4 <br /> 1 MINUTES <br /> 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> 3 Excerpt of OCTOBER 17,2016 <br /> 4 DRAFT Minutes SPECIAL MEETING <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT: Tony Blake (Vice-Chair), Bingham Township Representative; Lisa Stuckey, Chapel Hill <br /> 8 Township Representative; Patricia Roberts, Cheeks Township Representative; Laura Nicholson, Eno Township <br /> 9 Representative; Kim Piracci,At-Large; Buddy Hartley, Little River Township Representative; <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 MEMBERS ABSENT: Lydia Wegman (Chair), At-Large Chapel Hill Township Representative; Paul Guthrie, At-Large <br /> 13 Chapel Hill Township; Andrea Rohrbacher, At-Large Chapel Hill Township; Maxecine Mitchell, At-Large Bingham <br /> 14 Township; <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Perdita Holtz; Planning Systems Coordinator; Ashley Moncado, <br /> 18 Special Projects Planner; Patrick Mallett, Planner II; Molly Boyle, Planning Technician; <br /> 19 <br /> 20 OTHERS PRESENT: Emily Bane, Member of the Public; Curtis Bane, Member of the Public; <br /> 21 <br /> 22 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Tony Blake called the meeting to order. <br /> 25 <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Agenda Item 7: Unified Development Ordinance(UDO) Text Amendment- To review revisions suggested <br /> 29 at the September 12 quarterly public hearing and make a recommendation to the BOCC on <br /> 30 government-initiated amendments to the text of the UDO that would modify existing <br /> 31 regulations the pertain to the Hillsborough Economic Development District. <br /> 32 Presenter: Perdita Holtz, Planning Systems Coordinator <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Perdita Holtz reviewed the abstract. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Tony Blake:And when you say prohibited do you mean not allowed by right but people could still apply for it? <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Perdita Holtz: Not allowed by right but they could apply through other means. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Perdita Holtz continued presentation. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Tony Blake: Has this list been gone over with Steve Brantley from economic development? My concern is this might <br /> 43 prevent economic development for a wet lab or something like that where there's actually a demand. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Perdita Holtz: I did not show this specifically to Steve but things wet labs and pharmaceutical fall under entirely <br /> 46 different categories. I do not have any concerns with things being removed these are not uses we had envisioned for <br /> 47 the economic development district. But the way that the district was done by NAICS code, it made the tables much <br /> 48 longer to start listing all of the subcategories. I should tell you that how we're doing the whole overhaul of the tables <br /> 49 of permitted uses that Michael talked about last month, the Attorney's Office is strongly feeling that we should go to <br /> 50 using the NAICS Code throughout all of the tables. And it has to do with having all of your prohibited uses listed in <br /> 51 your table so that everybody knows that it's listed, there are no stars, it's prohibited. We've done some initial cutting <br /> 52 and pasting and it's about a 70 page long table of permitted uses. So it's pretty significant. But it looks to be the <br /> 53 direction we're moving in. <br /> 54 <br />