Agenda - 06-21-1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

PAGE 4 • 1 AGRICULTURAL AL'ION DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS Chair of the Agricultural Preservation Committee Elizabeth Walters reported that the Committee developed a Farmland Preservation Program Ordinance and also has come up with eight (8) recommendations which she listed. (A copy of the proposed ordinance and the recommendations is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's Office). She listed those counties who have ongoing farm preservation programs and the need for such a program in Orange County. Commissioner Hartwell asked how it would help a farmer to be in an agricultural district. Elizabeth Walters indicated it would protect a farmer's land from outside areas and that this is all that can be accomplished with the legislation that is now in place. Chair Marshall stated that when an agricultural district is established that also established would be a vocal spokesunit. This is a good place to start to get some of the other steps in farmland preservation started. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Hartwell to endorse recommendation #5 which states "recommend the County Commissioners go back to the legislature to get Use-Value Taxation changed so that when farmland is sold by one farmer to another farmer the deferred tax is not due. If the real intent is to preserve agriculture, the deferred tax should be due only if changed to another use" and to authorize the Chair to write a letter to the Legislative Research Commission, by July 1 in support of this recommendation. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis to refer the proposed Farmland Preservation Program Ordinance to the County Attorney and the County Manager for a recommendation to be brought back to the Board. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 2. FINAL REPORT OF THE gIE ADVISORY COMMITTEE (A copy of the report is on file in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's Office.) Karen Gottavi of Independent Opinion Research presented the final report from the CIP Advisory Committee along with her recommendations as to the steps that should be taken in the preparation for a referendum on a general obligation bond issue. She reiterated the meetings that took place and briefly described what happened at each meeting. Priorities were identified for five year, ten year and beyond ten year projects. Priority items were selected for the November, 1988 referendum. She emphasized that the highest priorities were those projects that needed to be built or implemented immediately. The jail needs to be renovated in year one as recommended by the CIP. The committee felt that the Chapel Hill/Carrboro School Projects and the Orange County Projects should be completed as proposed in the GIP. The committee recognized that the second elementary school that is scheduled for year six is important and needs to be considered. The committee added to the priority list land acquisition in the northern part of the county for a reservoir and felt this process should begin in year one. Karen continued with listing those items that were rated moderate priority which should be built or implemented within the 5 year CIP program. She--pointed--out that the__committee had trouble understanding the concept of the rural education center. She suggested that it needs to be reworked and to clarify-the-concept and include this in year 4 or 5 of the CIP (particularly land acquisition) . She continued listing those items that were rated extended priority -- those items that should be built or implemented beyond the 5 year CIP. The committee did not discuss or include the proposed airport in their discussions. Gottovi summarized that the committee concluded that three projects would be appropriate for the bond issue. These are (1) Chapel Hill-Carrboro School Projects, (2) Orange County School Projects to include the new elementary that is proposed in year 6