Orange County NC Website
. . . <br /> • , - . 6/q2/ri <br /> . . <br /> . . . <br /> . . <br /> _.... • <br /> . - . <br /> . 'MEMO TO: • Board of Commissioners <br /> • <br /> FROM: John Link, County Manager ?O.- <br /> • SUBJECT: Alternatives for School Funding <br /> DATE: June 17, 1988 <br /> Based n individual Commissioner comments made during the <br /> course mbf this week's budget discussions, you have shared <br /> concerns about the following: <br /> 1) Finding ai budget alternative which would reduce the <br /> Chapel Hill/Carrboro School district tax. . <br /> 2) Meeting the needs of the Orange County system. <br /> 3) Narrowing the gap in percentage increases for the two <br /> school systems. <br /> . . <br /> • . <br /> 4) Keeping tax rate increases down for all citizens of <br /> Orange County, given the upcoming bond issue. . :4k.,, • <br /> - . <br /> With these concerns in mind, we have-formulated the <br /> • following draft alternative for tunding education in FY <br /> 1988-89. <br /> 1) Increase the per student allocation tram $950 to $967 <br /> This would provide an additional $87,000 to Orange <br /> County and an additional $93,000 it County funds to <br /> Chapel Hill/Carrboro. <br /> • 2) Increase the 'approoriation from fund balance In the <br /> Chapel Hill/Carrboro system from $515,000 to <br /> $644,000. This would leave an estimated undesignatea <br /> fund balance of $511,000, or 4.5% of the current - - <br /> expense fund. (Per present Connissioner Policy, <br /> .Tnmeimun. undesignated Fund balance is 5.5%) <br /> 3) Decrease the district tax tram 18.75 cants ( a 2.25 <br /> cent increase) to 17.75 cents (a 2.25 cent increase) . <br /> • This decrease in the recommended tax rate could be • <br /> accomplished without reducing the original _ <br /> reconnuended funding level available to Chapel <br /> Eill/Carrboro schools because of the additional <br /> $93,000 from County funds and the additional $129,000 - <br /> appropriation from fund balance. <br /> • • <br /> The above scenario would cost the County's General Fund • <br /> $179,707. This is equivalent to .54 cents on the County's <br /> . • property tax rate. . ' . <br /> .• <br /> . . <br /> . . <br /> . . . <br /> . . <br /> . . . . <br /> . . <br /> - . .. • <br /> . _ <br />