Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-06-1988
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1988
>
Agenda - 06-06-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2016 12:21:14 PM
Creation date
10/21/2016 11:54:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/6/1988
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.. . <br /> . . <br /> 146 <br /> Al IWOrange Water and Sewer Authority <br /> 400 Jones Ferry Road <br /> OWASA P.O. Box 366 <br /> Carrboro, NC 27510 <br /> (919) 9684421 . <br /> . . <br /> May 2, 1988 h" :"-)1ECEIV rn, <br /> 1s ) 5-4--b:: L--;_,) <br /> Ms. Emily Crudup <br /> Planning Department <br /> Orange County <br /> 306F Revere Road <br /> Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br /> Dear Emily: <br /> SUBJECT: OWASA STAFF COMMENTS: PROPOSED OAK CREST SUBDIVISION - <br /> . . <br /> Orange Water and Sewer Authority (MAW staff has reviewed the April 6, <br /> 1988 plans for the proposed Oak Crest Subdivision. This project would be <br /> located within the University Lake water supply watershed; therefore, the <br /> subdivision should be designed and constructed in a manner which will not <br /> adversely affect the quality of the water within this drinking water supply <br /> source. <br /> The following comments are offered for consideration by Orange County during <br /> the project review and approval process. The G,JASA Board of Directors has <br /> not reviewed and considered the proposed project or these staff comments. <br /> However, the Board has previously expressed concern about the need for: (1) <br /> effective stormwater runoff management practices for all projects within the <br /> University Lake and Cane Creek watersheds; (2) effective, permanent <br /> sedimentation and erosion control measures; and (3) proper long-term <br /> operation, maintenance and inspection of on-site and cluster wastewater <br /> disposal systems in public water supply watersheds. <br /> Stormwater Runoff Controls <br /> The project would be located only about 0.75 miles from the upper end of the <br /> Price Creek arm of University Lake. During a typical rainfall event <br /> pollutant runoff from the site would reach the lake in a very short time <br /> (considerably less than 6 hours) . As reconunended under Triangle J Council <br /> of Governments guidelines, the project site should be considered within a <br /> water quality critical area. Additional water quality protection buffer <br /> , . area should be provided along Price Creek and the steeply-sloped drainageway <br /> that bisects much of the site (shown on the attached sketch) . <br /> The proposed 38-lot subdivision (revised from 41 lots) would have an average <br /> lot-size-of-approxtelyt2._6_acres_, with an overall development density of <br /> one unit per three acres. Based on preliminary informatlon developed-for <br /> the University Lake watershed study, an average lot size of one dwelling <br /> unit per two acres (assuming 6% impervious surface) throughout the watershed <br /> would result in degradation of the public water supply. Additional water <br /> quality protection measures will be needed if development occurs at a <br /> density of one unit per two acres and could be needed at lower development <br /> densities, such as that proposed for this project. It is recommended that <br /> consideration be given to requiring a wet pond or other suitable area-wide <br /> water quality protection measure for this project. A suggested general <br /> location for such a structure is shown on the attached marked-up plan. <br /> An Equal Opportunity Employer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.