Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
114 10 111 in\ IP If <br /> 7 <br /> pattern. Actual construction of the road to the - <br /> property boundary may not be required. <br /> If there is no apparent benefit or reason for a . <br /> right-of-way to continue to the adjacent parcel, <br /> then no dedication would be recommended. <br /> It is recommended that the right-of-way for <br /> Jacobs Trail be continued from the cul-de-sac to <br /> the southeast corner of the property. The <br /> recommendation is made based on two factors: <br /> 1. 1-40 is being constructed less than 1/2 mile <br /> to the east of the site. Options for access • <br /> to parcels on the east side of Eagles Chase <br /> are limited to the south side of the 1-40 <br /> right-of-way. Accesi to Ode Turner Road via <br /> Jacobs Road could be an option for the <br /> restricted properties. <br /> 2. Immediately south 0 Eagles Chase is an 80- <br /> acre tract currently zoned R-1. Jacobs Trail <br /> could potentially provide a second access to <br /> this property to avoid all traffic being <br /> directed to Ode Turner Road, currently the <br /> sole access. <br /> Dedication of the right-of-way will not in itself <br /> assure any particular future road pattern but <br /> will provide opportunities and options in the <br /> future. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> preliminary plan with the extension and <br /> dedication (to Orange County for public use) of <br /> the 50-foot right-of-way from the cul-de-sac on <br /> Jacobs Trail to the eastern property line. <br /> Actual construction of Jacobs Trail would <br /> terminate in a temporary cul-de-sac as presently <br /> shown. The future extension of Jacobs Trail <br /> would be the responsibility of the adjoining <br /> owner at the time the property to the east is <br /> developed and would require that the right-of-way <br /> in the cul-de-sac (above that required for a 50- <br /> foot right-of-way) be incorporated into lots 21, <br /> 22, and 23. <br /> Jacobs asked about the policy change relating to <br /> stubouts and reservation of rights-of-way. <br /> Collins responded that the County Attorney's <br /> concern arises out of the "taking issue" . If it <br /> is felt that a road should be extended to <br /> adjoining properties to serve future development <br /> and could form a sub-collector or collector <br />