Browse
Search
Minutes 09-12-2016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Minutes 09-12-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2016 8:26:39 AM
Creation date
10/19/2016 8:00:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/12/2016
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-12-2016 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-12-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-12-2016 - C.1 - Class A Special Use Permit - Solar Array off US Highway 70 in Cheeks Township
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-12-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-12-2016 - D.1 - Town of Hillsborough/Orange County Central Orange Coordinated Area Land Use Plan Map Amendment
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-12-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-12-2016 - D.2 - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments – Hillsborough Economic Development District
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-12-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-12-2016 - D.3 - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Hillsborough Economic Development District
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-12-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
Agenda - 09-12-2016 - D.4 - Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendment – Modify Use Standards
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2016\Agenda - 09-12-2016 - Quarterly Public Hearing
ORD-2016-031 Ordinance Amending UDO to modify use standards , etc., in Office/Research and Manufacturing zoning district
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2016
RES-2016-056 Resolution Amending the Town of Hillsborough/OC Central Orange Coordinated Area Land Use Plan
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> put 100 amps in a piece of wire, it does have an electromagnetic field, but if you had — if the <br /> utility has 200 amps in that wire before, and this facility puts 100 amps — it actually takes away <br /> 100 amps that would be going to substation to this point. So the net effect of having local <br /> generation is to reduce the overall electromagnetic fields that would be surrounding the <br /> conductors that would leave this facility and go across public land, or other people's property. <br /> The piles that we mount the racks on will be driven into the ground. We try to do the minimum <br /> amount of ground disturbance that we have. But there would be a sediment and erosion control <br /> plan, and it would be approved by the County before any construction starts. There is no <br /> pollution, radioactive spent fuels, coal ash, fracking or chemicals. This is probably the most <br /> benign, safest way we can produce electricity that we know of now on this utility scale. <br /> I would just like to say, the North Carolina Public Utilities Commission has issued a certificate of <br /> Public Convenience and Necessity for this project, so it would not have gotten to this point if the <br /> North Carolina Utilities Commission did not think that it was a necessary production for <br /> renewable energy. I'm here to answer any questions. <br /> Merrick Parrot: I just have one follow up question for you. Did you prepare an affidavit for <br /> this? <br /> Chris Sandifer: I prepared an affidavit. <br /> Merrick Parrot: Ok. And Commissioners that is the affidavit that's located behind tab 3 of your <br /> booklet. <br /> Chris Sandifer: And my testimony tonight is the same as that affidavit. Are there any <br /> questions? <br /> Chair McKee: Questions from the Board? <br /> Commissioner Jacobs: How often do you have occasion to review a site and find it not <br /> suitable for a solar array? <br /> Chris Sandifer: I would say most of the time—90 percent of the time—they're not suitable. In <br /> my experience, they— a lot of folks want them, but they're just not compatible. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs: And are you aware of any hazard to wildlife that might land on, or <br /> otherwise touch, the panels. <br /> Chris Sandifer: I'm not aware of any study that causes wildlife any problem. <br /> Chair McKee: Follow up? <br /> Commissioner Jacobs: No. He probably won't want to answer this question, but which <br /> elected official was it who claimed that the solar panels were stealing the sunshine from the <br /> adjoining jurisdictions? <br /> Chris Sandifer: I think I won't answer that question. <br /> Commissioner Rich: I have a question. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.