Minutes 09-12-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

23 o Phase 1 Environmental Assessment demonstrating there are no environmental impacts associated with the project (pages 34 through 110) o An appraisal completed by Kirkwood Appraisals LLC indicating the project would not impact adjacent property values (pages 111 through 134) o Traffic impact analysis completed by Kimley Horn (page 135) o Site plan completed by ESA Management as contained in Attachment 2. • Comments from the BOCC, Planning Board, and the general public. And • A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance with established standards. If the motion is to find there is insufficient evidence in the record to find the project is in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a), the Commissioner making the motion will have to specifically denote what is absent and explain what, if any, evidence is in the record disputing the claims of the applicant that they are in compliance with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (a). VOTE: UNANIMOUS Commissioner Dorosin made a friendly amendment to make the 11 conditions be entered, and this was accepted by the motioner and the seconder. VOTE: UNANIMOUS A motion was made by Commissioner Rich, seconded by Commissioner Price to find there is sufficient evidence in the record the project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (b) of the UDO in that the use will maintain the value of contiguous property based on competent material and evidence entered into the record of these proceedings, including: • Staff abstract and attachments, including the SUP application and site plan, presented at the September 12, 2016 Quarterly Public Hearing. • Staff testimony on the project and its compliance with various provisions of the UDO. • Applicant sworn testimony from the public hearing. • Attachment 1 of the September 12, 2016 Quarterly Public Hearing package including the following: o Detailed project narrative (pages 13 through 33) o An appraisal completed by Kirkwood Appraisals LLC indicating the project would not impact adjacent property values (pages 111 through 134) o Traffic impact analysis completed by Kimley Horn (page 135) o Site plan completed by ESA Management as contained in Attachment 2. • Comments from the BOCC, Planning Board, and the general public. And • A lack of competent material and substantial evidence entered into the record demonstrating the project's lack of compliance with established standards. VOTE: UNANIMOUS A motion was made by Commissioner Pelissier, seconded by Commissioner Price to find there is sufficient evidence in the record the project complies with Section 5.3.2 (A) (2) (c)