Agenda - 07-06-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

5 hotels, rooming houses, etc. (page 5-2 of the Zoning Ordinance) 2iSatifAP21 Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commis- sioner Halkiotis to approve the amendment to Article 5. 1.1 of the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 8. FLOWERS MOBILE HOME PARK PD 1-87 The County Attorney explained Special Use Permits and the pro- cess that is followed in considering and approving an application for a Planned Development. Marvin Collins presented for consideration an application for a proposed Planned Development - Mobile Home Park. Flowers Mobile Home Park is an existing park located in Eno Township on the west side of Mt. Hermon Church Road. The proposed Planned Development would be an expansion of the existing park, adding 25 mobile home spaces to the 43 existing spaces. The tract on which the park addition is to be located consists of 25 acres west of and adjacent to the existing park. The property is currently zoned R-I and is designated Rural Residential in the Land Use Plan. The Planning Board considered the evidence as presented at the Public Hearing and found no evidence that would warrant a denial of the application. They found the applicant complied with the standards, specific rules and required regulations. Certain negative findings were made which are addressed through conditions of approval attached to the Special Use Permit. The Planning Board recommended approval of the request with the attachment of 17 conditions. Conditions 5, 6, 8, and 13 address the negative findings found by the Planning Board. Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Com- missioner Carey to approve the request for a Class A Special Use Permit for the Planned Development - Mobile Home Park application of Flowers Mobile Home Park and rezoning of the property from Residential-1 to PD- MHP-R-1 subject to the seventeen (17) conditions as listed below. Motion for approval is based on positive findings by the Board of Commissioners that there is a preponderance of evidence which indicates compliance with the general standards and specific rules governing the specific use or where negative findings have been made, compliance with the required standards and regulations has been assured through the recommended con- ditions of approval. Chair Marshall amended the motion to add conditions 18 and 19 as listed below: 1. The grantee of this Special Use Permit shall post with Orange County, in a form acceptable to the County Attorney, a bond or letter of credit in an amount equal to the cost of all public improvements plus 10%. The amount shall be determined on the basis of fully executed construction con- tracts or certification by a registered engineer employed by the grantee of this Special Use Permit. Security for construction of the improvements in this project may follow phasing in the project. Specifically, as improvements are completed in each phase a corresponding amount of money may be released from the security instruments or the security instruments may be renegotiated based on the "yet to do" portion of the improvements. 2 . Security shall be provided for the grading, paving and stabilization of all cleared areas, streets and other vehicular travelways; sidewalks and other pedestrian walk- ways; erection of street signs; utility installation and