Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-06-1987
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
Agenda - 07-06-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2016 11:10:03 AM
Creation date
10/18/2016 10:54:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/6/1987
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
358
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY OF LITTLE RIVER TAC MEETING <br /> HELD IN CALDWELL ON JUNE 3, 1987 <br /> 2 J PAGE 5 <br /> Karen Barrows said it didn 't seem to fit the criteria <br /> for an activity node and Chris Best pointed out that Holly <br /> Ridge Road was not a collector road. Bell stated that the <br /> node was carried forward from the 1981 Land Use Plan. He <br /> also said that Holly Ridge Road was not identified as a <br /> collector road in the plan in either the listing of road <br /> classifications or on the map of road types. For these <br /> reasons, he felt the TAC had sufficient Justification for <br /> suggesting removal of the node. <br /> A motion was made by Deanna Smith and seconded by Brad <br /> Walker to: <br /> Recommend that the Plan go to the Planning Board as <br /> updated with the following conditions: <br /> ( 1 ) That the Orange County Speedway be included as an <br /> activity node in the update ( unanimous) ; <br /> (2) That the Harris Crossroads activity node be put <br /> back on the Land Use Plan update ( 4 in favor, 4 <br /> opposed) ; and <br /> (3) That the Berry 's Grove activity node be removed <br /> from the Land Use Plan update (5 in favor, 3 <br /> opposed) . <br /> The TAC voted unanimously on the motion. <br /> It was the consensus of the TAC that, as a related <br /> issue, the Planning Staff and Planning Board study all <br /> relevant watershed protection measures prior to any being <br /> chosen as a plan implementation strategy. <br /> In closing, Karen Barrows asked if there was a mechanism <br /> for dismissal of TAC members who repeatedly missed meetings . <br /> Bell stated that TAC operating guidelines did not address <br /> this and suggested that the Planning Board might want to <br /> consider amending the guidelines at their long-range meeting <br /> in July. <br /> The meeting adjourned at approximately 9: 15. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.