Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
IL ' n �'1 ~ <br /> i . <br /> 7 - t <br /> • y 6 U <br /> 18i <br /> between "posting requirements" in Article 2 . 3 . 3 and Article 20 <br /> (Zoning Text/Atlas Amendments) . Currently, the property must be <br /> posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the meeting date. <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment. <br /> Jacobs asked why 10 days rather than 15 days is being proposed is <br /> being proposed as the uniform standard. Collins responded that <br /> the General Statutes require that an advertisement for a public <br /> hearing be advertised for the first time not less than 10 days or <br /> more than 25 days prior to the hearing and the 10 day standard is <br /> a minimum standard. Complaints have been received that there are <br /> so many variations between the administrative procedures and <br /> mechanisms of the Board, there needs to be more uniformity. <br /> Therefore, Staff felt that posting requirements for public <br /> hearings should be consistent throughout. <br /> There were no public comments. <br /> MOTION: Commissioner Hartwell moved, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis, <br /> to refer this amendment to the Planning Board for recommendation <br /> to the Board of Commissioners on July 6, 1987 . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> 5. Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br /> a. Section III-B-3 - Sketch Plan Review <br /> Staff presentation by Marvin Collins. <br /> Section III-B-3 of the Subdivision Regulations contains the <br /> procedure for Sketch Plan review of subdivision proposals. <br /> Unlike review provisions for Preliminary Plans and final Plats, <br /> no time limit is set for the validity of Planning Staff review of <br /> Sketch Plans. To prevent Planning Staff review of Sketch Plans <br /> from being considered a permanent approval, a revision of the <br /> regulations is proposed. <br /> The proposed revision places a time limit of one (1) year on the <br /> validity of the Planning Staff Sketch Plan comments and clarifies <br /> language in the regulations regarding the significance of the <br /> comments. <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment. <br /> There were no questions or comments. <br /> MOTION: Commissioner Carey moved, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, <br /> to refer this amendment to the Planning Board for recommendation <br /> to the Board of Commissioners on July 6, 1987 . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> b. Section VIII-B - Amendments <br />