Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
D ° 134 <br /> a C <br /> the Planning Board approves the preliminary and <br /> sends it forward to the Commissioners. <br /> Jacobs reminded the Board that Fritz Brunnsen, <br /> representing the developer, had indicated at the <br /> meeting on May 18, that the developer would be <br /> agreeable to constructing the left turn lane in <br /> phase I if the Board so desired. <br /> MOTION: Eddleman moved approval with conditions #1 -8, making <br /> condition #9 applicable to Phase I . Seconded by <br /> Pilkey. <br /> VOTE: 5 in favor. <br /> 2 opposed ( Best - voting consistently, until policy is <br /> set regarding certifications ; Jacobs - voting no due to <br /> not being covered under a policy) <br /> 1 abstained (Yuhasz - due to professional conflict of <br /> interest) . <br /> Jacobs asked why underground utilities are not required <br /> for all phase developments. Yuhasz responded that <br /> underground utilities are a requirement of the <br /> Hillsborough Zoning Ordinance and not the Orange County <br /> Zoning Ordinance. Collins indicated that underground <br /> utilities are a specific standard for planned develop- <br /> ments only . <br /> Yuhasz asked if public water and sewer can be required <br /> if Health Department approval for wells and septic <br /> tanks has already been given. Collins responded that a <br /> larger issue is whether or not the County enforces the <br /> provider ' s water/sewer policy. <br /> g. Archie M. Graham, Jr. - Final <br /> (Cheeks Township) <br /> Presentation by Greg Szymik . <br /> The property in question is located in Cheeks Township on <br /> the east side of Efland-Cedar Grove Road ( SR 1004) . There <br /> is one ( 1 ) new lot proposed ; the lot size is 3 .6786 acres. <br /> The zoning designation is Rural Residential ( R- 1 ) with the <br /> overlay district of Upper Eno Protected Watershed (PW- II ) . <br /> The Land Use Plan designation is Rural Residential and Upper <br /> Eno Water Supply Watershed. <br /> All applicable agencies have reviewed and commented on the <br /> proposal . On April 27 , 1987 , the Planning Board recommended <br /> approval of the subdivision subject to the applicant indi <br /> eating the lot size excluding right-of-way and provision of <br /> a landscape plan demonstrating compliance with Section IV-B- <br /> 8. On May 19, 1987 , the Board of Commissioners approved the <br /> subdivision as recommended by the Planning Board . The <br /> applicant, in submitting the Final Plat, has addressed those <br />