Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-13-2016 - Abstract for Joint Meeting Discussion Items
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 10-13-2016 - Joint Mtg. - Town of Carrboro
>
Agenda - 10-13-2016 - Abstract for Joint Meeting Discussion Items
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2016 3:53:26 PM
Creation date
10/10/2016 3:48:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/13/2016
Meeting Type
Municipalities
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-13-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
49 <br /> Mixed Use and Retail <br /> Many participants, though not all, welcomed the idea of Community Commercial/Retail on a few specific <br /> sites if economically feasible. While participants expressed a range of opinions on whether this could <br /> work, most were interested in the possibility of small-scale retail spaces that were walkable. We explored <br /> the meaning of this with a range of photographs of commercial and mixed use. Common themes: 1) No <br /> more than 2 stories, 2) 4-6 shops max, 3) integrated into the design fabric of the community <br /> More than 50% considered a "fit" <br /> The photos below received just a bit more than half of respondents who felt like these examples could fit <br /> in, mostly because of the scale and the integration into residential community life. <br /> r <br /> ,, ei� 1 r t yam ,, <br /> ie,4. upogiir„„ mumnuu�,, <br /> 4 y ''' <br /> � ! �..�tea. I ir.--- \10;P. <br /> , ..r <br /> Pti <br /> Mixed responses <br /> Around 50% found the structures in the photos below could fit in. Comments on the left photograph <br /> suggested that the retail spaces were small enough to include a range of options but many did not like <br /> the "strip-mall" feel of the parking. The right photo was one of the only mixed-use that did not receive <br /> overwhelming "no", likely because of the smaller scale. <br /> .1 <br /> Or marl, <br /> L '' I , I' i i i,I �I ill }i <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> "+17 r I� rrz� <br /> Absolute "NO!" <br /> Pictures like the below received unanimous dislike: too urban, too large, or too suburban. <br /> VIIII <br /> 1 <br /> t 1 <br /> .4 �p'i( /' <br /> r„'**gin s? r y ..r..i <br /> 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.