Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-94-IX-C
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 11-01-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-01-94-IX-C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2016 10:32:33 AM
Creation date
10/7/2016 10:31:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
IX-C
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br /> are materials that DOT could break down and use <br /> again, the County would want them to do so. She <br /> continued that Commissioner Willhoit indicated he <br /> felt there were materials that DOT could reuse. <br /> Waddell stated that he felt nothing would be <br /> accomplished by such a proposal. Willis stated <br /> that if the borrow pit is on DOT property, <br /> nothing can be done; it is totally exempt from <br /> County regulations. If it is on private property <br /> that is leased, a Special Use Permit would be <br /> required for the excavation and another for the <br /> refilling of the pit. With this proposal, DOT <br /> would not have to go through the condemnation and <br /> purchase process. The County would have a little <br /> more control over what goes back into the pits . <br /> If DOT did not comply, then the amendment could <br /> be removed and DOT would again be required to get <br /> the Special Use Permits. Reid agreed that such <br /> a proposal would not accomplish anything. <br /> Burklin noted that this is a good way to state <br /> the County policy to recycle, but would not like <br /> to have the County expend a lot of time and <br /> expense. He felt it would just make a policy <br /> statement. Willis responded that she felt that <br /> was probably Commissioner Willhoit's intent. <br /> MOTION: Burklin moved approval of the revised language as <br /> presented by the Planning Staff. Seconded by <br /> Brown. <br /> VOTE: 4 in favor. <br /> 3 opposed (Waddell, Jobsis, Reid - felt it would <br /> not accomplish anything) . <br /> AGENDA ITEM #11: MATTERS PROPOSED FOR PUBLIC HEARING (11/30/94) <br /> a. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments <br /> ( 1) Article 4 . 1 - Uses Permitted by Right In All <br /> Zoning Districts <br /> (Telephone/fiber optic equipment buildings) <br /> Presentation by Mary Willis. <br /> This item is to consider a proposed amendment to <br /> Article 4 . 1 of the Zoning Ordinance which would <br /> reduce restrictions related to the placement of <br /> cabinetized telephone equipment. <br /> The Zoning Ordinance lists uses allowed by right <br /> in all districts. A number of those uses are <br /> related to the distribution of utility services. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.