Agenda - 11-01-94-IX-C - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

11 could be deleted from the ordinance if NCDOT did not follow through with reclamation. Likewise, the provision could be deleted if the County was dissatisfied with the performance of NCDOT for any other reason, including the failure to reasonably recycle construction debris. The alternative would be for NCDOT to purchase the property, exempting the project from local land use regulations. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment. Barrows asked who would make the complaint regarding reclamation on private property. Willis responded that the property owner or an adjacent property owner would probably be the ones who would make the complaint. She also noted inspectors in the field could make the report. Burklin asked about the constraints that the County would be enforcing. Willis responded that if the criteria listed was met, the use would be permitted by right and not require a Special Use Permit. MOTION: Barrows moved approval of the Planning Staff's recommendation. Seconded by Burklin. VOTE: Unanimous. d. Other Subdivision Ordinance Text Amendments ( 1) Lot Boundaries (Public Rights-of-Way) Presentation by Mary Willis. This item is to consider a proposed amendment to the Subdivision Regulations which would require that property lines go to the edge of public road rights-of-way and that the area within private road easements be included within lot boundaries. The proposed amendment makes explicit the practice of Orange County to require that property lines go to the edge of public road rights-of-way and that the area within private road easements be included within lot boundaries. In the case of public roads, the property is dedicated for use by the public and there are no individual rights or responsibilities associated with the right-of-way, even if it is included in the deed description for an adjoining parcel.