Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-94 - VIII-G
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 11-01-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-01-94 - VIII-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2016 10:31:43 AM
Creation date
10/7/2016 10:24:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VIII-G
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
45 <br /> (A copy of the Private Road Justification and the <br /> Staff Evaluation are attachments to these minutes <br /> on pages . ) <br /> Barrows asked about the utility lines in relation <br /> to the trees being planted in the right-of-way. <br /> Willis responded that on a private road there is <br /> some flexibility for working with utility <br /> providers. <br /> Willis referred to the proposed conservation <br /> easement noting that Triangle Land Conservancy <br /> was approached and indicated they were not <br /> interested. She noted that there are several <br /> possibilities for the handling of such an <br /> easement such as a non-profit conservation <br /> organization or the Homeowner's Association. <br /> According to a letter from the County Attorney, <br /> Orange County should be a third party beneficiary <br /> in order to ensure that the County will review <br /> any and all changes in the agreement. <br /> Willis noted that agency comments have been <br /> incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. <br /> Willis noted that initial correspondence from <br /> NCDOT indicated that the aprons of the private <br /> roads within the dedicated right-of-way must be <br /> paved. However, this requirement is now being <br /> reconsidered by NCDOT, and may not be included in <br /> the final plans which will be reviewed and <br /> approved by NCDOT. <br /> Willis continued that it is most likely that this <br /> subdivision will be developed in a single phase. <br /> However, if there is more than one phase, Lot F <br /> and the conservation easements and equestrian/ <br /> pedestrian trail shall be constructed or secured <br /> in the first phase, and an easement be provided <br /> to assure access from Elizabeth Walters Road to <br /> Lot F (the arboretum) . <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of the <br /> Preliminary Plan for Hannah Creek Subdivision in <br /> accordance with the Resolution of Approval (copy <br /> an attachment to these minutes on pages ) . <br /> Barrows asked about references in the County <br /> Attorney's letter to the use of certain lots for <br /> local commercial purposes and further <br /> subdivision. Willis responded that the applicant <br /> had indicated the possibility of a church or <br /> day care facility on the corner lots sometime in <br /> the future. She continued that any use of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.