Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-01-94 - VIII-G
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 11-01-94 Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 11-01-94 - VIII-G
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2016 10:31:43 AM
Creation date
10/7/2016 10:24:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/1/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
VIII-G
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT-13-1994 13:43 FROM COLEMAN GLEDHILL HARGRAVE TO 6443002 P.02 <br /> LAW OFFICES <br /> • 14 <br /> COLEMAN, GLEDHILL &. HARGRAVE ALONZO BROWN COLDAAN, <br /> A PROFF.351ONAL CORPORATIOD1 <br /> GF.OFFRET 6 m Fr+wrt i <br /> 129 E.TRYON STR8TT DOLX3IA5 HARGRAVE <br /> P.O.DRAWER 1329 KIM K.S718l•AN <br /> H1LLS C ROWH•NORTH CAROLINA I7278 IANb7 D.DUTTON <br /> (419)732.2196 DOUXLAS P.THOREN <br /> FAX 0193 732.7997 <br /> October 13, 1994 <br /> Ms. Mary Willis <br /> Orange County Harming wept. <br /> 306F Revere Road <br /> Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br /> Re: Hannah Creek <br /> Dear Mary: <br /> Geof and I reviewed the preliminary plan, architectural standards, restrictive covenants, <br /> and road maintenance agreement accompanying your 8/31/94 request. We did not receive a copy <br /> of the private road justification, if one was submitted. In our review of the documents we did <br /> receive, we note the following: <br /> 1. Standards for Vernacular Southern Architecture. We did not review and have no <br /> comments on the architectural guidelines as they are not required by the Zoning or Subdivision <br /> Regulations of Orange County.; • <br /> 2. Hannah Creek Covenants. We did not review and have no comment on architectural <br /> requirements or other similar restrictions contained in the covenants. We are unable to determine <br /> whether the language contained in Paragraph 4 of this document restricting the clearing of trees <br /> satisfies the landscaping requirements of Orange County for this particular subdivision. <br /> Paragraph 5 makes reference to a permitted use of certain lots for local commercial <br /> purposes. This reference seems inappropriate since the property is not zoned for local <br /> commercial use. In-home office facilities may or may not be permitted under the Home <br /> Occupations section of the Zoning Ordinance and may be affected by the impervious surface <br /> regulations as well. <br /> Paragraph 6 makes reference to possible further subdivision of lots within Hannah Creek. <br /> We note that further subdivision of these lots may individually or cumulatively affect the <br /> appropriateness of private mad servicing lots within this subdivision. <br /> Paragraph 13 establishes easements for wildlife, walking trails, equestrian riding trails, <br /> and an arboretum and states that they are to remain as private property. It also states that <br /> Hannah Creek,inc. may grant a conservation easement to a non-profit conservation organization, <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.