Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-29-2007-
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 03-29-2007
>
Agenda - 03-29-2007-
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 9:11:58 AM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/29/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070329
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
High density storage in pools remains the most popular technology for storing the <br />mounting inventory of spent nuclear power plant fuel at US nuclear power plants. The <br />NRC and the nuclear power industry continue to refuse to recognize and address plant <br />terrorism and security vulnerabilities. Nuclear power plants, and. particularly the <br />Shearon Harris plant, continue to experience alarming and dangerous failures of <br />equipment and normal site security measures. <br />Insofar as Shearon Harris plant is concerned, CP&L/ Progress Energy has submitted a <br />"Letter of Intent to Apply for License Renewal" for the plant to the NRC. The application <br />itself, expected to be submitted in a October-December 2006 timeframe, will be seeking <br />a 20 -year extension of Shearon Harris' current operating license (expires in 2026).. <br />There is no state regulatory control that will apply to the license renewal, but the NRC <br />evaluation process is anticipated to take approximately 30 months (see the attached <br />exhibit for the Pilgrim nuclear power plant permitting. schedule). <br />CP&L/Progress Energy has also indicated to the NRC and the public that it is planning <br />to embark on the process to develop two new reactors at Shearon Harris. The plan to <br />construct new nuclear generators (and new coal fired generators as well) was opposed <br />by.a number of environmental/conservation groups at this year's (May, June) annual <br />Integrated Resource Planning hearings held by the NC Utilities Commission (see <br />attached Utilities Commission docket). However, in a ruling issued on August 31, 2006, <br />the Utilities Commission found that it could not agree with a "proposed adoption of a <br />blanket policy against the construction of any new nuclear or fossil-fired plants .. (see <br />page 29 of the attached NCUC docket). Information published on the NRC website <br />indicates that NRC staff expects CP&L/Progress Energy to submit a Combined License <br />Application (COL- a permit, which authorizes the construction and conditional operation <br />of a nuclear power facility) for two reactors in FY 2008. On a separate regulatory track, <br />the. NC Utilities Commission (NCUC) would have to approve the development of new <br />reactors (or power plants using any technology). The process to obtain NCUC approval <br />(in the form of an Electric Generation Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity <br />to Construct) would be initiated subsequent to the granting of the COL and would <br />involve the North Carolina environmental clearinghouse review process, public <br />*hearings, etc. Accordingly, CP&L/Progress Energy officials have indicated that the <br />utility will be holding a number of "Town Hall"-type meetirigs to make its case to the <br />public for the need for more nuclear power. <br />As CP&L/Progress Energy moves forward with process of re-licensing its existing plant <br />and developing ng new reactors, there remain a number of unresolved safety and <br />operational issues at the existing plant, including: <br />• Potential failures in the backup core cooling system stemming. from known <br />design flaws involving insufficient recirculation of cooling water; and <br />• Elevated risk of core meltdown stemming from loss of off-sitepower coincidental <br />with the failure of on-site emergency generators;. and <br />• Faulty materials protecting the reactor cooling system; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.