Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-06-1994-X-B
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1994
>
Agenda - 09-06-94 Special Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-06-1994-X-B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 4:07:46 PM
Creation date
10/6/2016 4:07:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/6/1994
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
X-B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> APPLICATION OF STREAM BUFFER PROVISIONS ON EXISTING LOTS OF RECORD <br /> L DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM <br /> Article 6.23.7b of the Zoning Ordinance requires that new structures and septic systems be located <br /> outside of stream buffers. Outside of watershed critical areas,the width of the buffer ranges from <br /> 50 feet to 150 feet, depending on slope, and is measured from the edge of the floodplain. Within <br /> watershed critical areas, there is no upper limit on the width of the buffer. <br /> Article 6.23.7e of the Zoning Ordinance requires that new structures be located at least 150'from <br /> a reservoir, or outside of the stream buffer, whichever is greater. <br /> Article 6.23.8 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that septic systems be located at least 300' from <br /> a reservoir, 100' from a stream, or outside of the stream buffer, whichever is greater. <br /> The current watershed regulations, which implemented the State mandate, became effective on <br /> January 1, 1994. At that time,the Orange County portions of the Lower Eno, South Hyco Creek, <br /> Haw River and Jordan Take Watersheds were designated as protected watersheds for the first <br /> time. Also, the portions of the Back Creek, Upper Eno, Flat River, South Hyco Creek and Little <br /> River Watersheds in Cedar Grove and Little River Townships, which were previously designated <br /> as protected watersheds only in the Comprehensive Plan, were made subject to requirements of <br /> the watershed protection overlay districts through the zoning of those townships. <br /> As a result, existing lots on which a stream is located, in most of Little River, Cedar Grove and <br /> Eno Townships and a small portion of Chapel Hill and Bingham Townships, have recently (as of <br /> 1/1/94) been made subject to stream buffer requirements. In some cases, the application of these <br /> setbacks may render an existing lot unbuildable without a variance, since the width of the buffer <br /> was not taken into account when the lot was created. <br /> For example, the Bellechene East Subdivision, located adjacent to Take Orange, was approved <br /> prior to the zoning of Cedar Grove Township and the application of watershed protection <br /> standards. Eighteen of the 30 lots are located entirely or almost entirely within 300 feet of Lake <br /> Orange, and would be unbuildable if the 300' septic system setback were applied. Most of the <br /> lots surrounding Lake Orange are now non-conforming and may be unbuildable without a variance <br /> if the 300' septic setback and 150' building setback are applied. <br /> The same problem can arise with regard to stream buffers in cases where the lot was created prior <br /> to the current stream buffer requirements. The extent of potential problems adjacent to streams <br /> is difficult to identify because the lots which could potentially be impacted cover a large geographic <br /> area. <br /> The remedy available at this time is for the property owner to seek a variance of the setback <br /> requirements to the extent necessary to develop the property. An amendment to the Zoning <br /> Ordinance was presented for public hearing on February 28, 1994 and would have allowed a <br /> reduction in the septic and building setbacks on lots adjacent to reservoirs which were created <br /> prior to January 1, 1994 to the extent necessary to build on the property, provided that septic <br /> systems and structures remained outside of stream buffers, and the septic system remained at <br /> least 100 feet from the reservoir (as required by the State mandate). The amendment was <br /> proposed in an effort to address the concerns expressed by many of the property owners <br /> surrounding Lake Orange. The amendment was not approved due, at least in part, to opposition <br /> from OWASA. OWASA was concerned that the proposed amendment would be perceived as a <br /> relaxation of Orange County's commitment to watershed protection in the Cane Creek watershed. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.