Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY 1 <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date: September 6, 1994 <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item # x-13 <br /> SUBJECT: Report on Application of Stream Buffer Requirements on Existing <br /> Lots <br /> DEPARTMENT: PLANNING PUBLIC HEARING Yes x No <br /> ATTACHMENT(S) : INFORMATION CONTACT: <br /> Mary Willis <br /> Extension 2583 <br /> TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br /> Hillsborough-732-8181 <br /> Durham -688-7331 <br /> Mebane -227-2031 <br /> Chapel Hill -967-9251 <br /> PURPOSE: To consider a strategy to be used in addressing <br /> development of existing lots of record which are subject <br /> to stream or reservoir buffer requirements. <br /> BACKGROUND: Attached is a report concerning stream buffer provisions <br /> of the Zoning Ordinance, as applied to existing lots of <br /> record. There have been a number of complaints concerning <br /> the impact of stream and reservoir buffer requirements. <br /> In some cases, the required buffers may render an existing <br /> lot unbuildable without a variance, since the width of the <br /> buffer was not taken into account when the lot was <br /> created. This issue creates a particular problem for the <br /> existing lots surrounding Lake Orange. <br /> The Board of Commissioners may wish to reconsider possible <br /> alternatives to variance requests for stream and reservoir <br /> buffers on lots which existed before January 1, 1994 . A <br /> recommended strategy is included in the attached report, <br /> and would allow the Planning Staff, in consultation with <br /> Environmental Health and the County Engineer, to issue a <br /> zoning compliance permit for development which does not <br /> meet the minimum buffer requirementsywhen specified <br /> findings could be documented. In all other cases, a <br /> variance request would be presented to the Board of <br /> Adjustment according to current procedures. <br /> It is also recommended that wells be permitted in stream <br /> buffers in cases where the additional flexibility in well <br /> location could eliminate the need for an exception to or <br /> variance of setback requirements for structures or septic <br /> systems. Another issue which should be explored is the <br />