Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
rx <br /> Pz <br /> C • <br /> it <br /> 4 <br /> { Marvin Collins indicated the greatest help would be to establish a <br /> work program and set priorities so the staff would know what to do. <br /> s He emphasized that day to day activity leaves very little time to work <br /> on the priorities. <br /> Steve Kizer noted it important that the work program have some <br /> { flexibility because priorities do change and the work program needs to <br /> be less restrictive. <br /> Ken Thompson noted that any work program needs to be tied to a <br /> schedule giving the estimated time for completion and also what <br /> additional staff it will take to accomplish those priorities. <br /> L 7. ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES <br /> " Issue: Staffi does not always have ode <br /> ordinance enforcement. y adequate personnel available for <br /> Suggested Action: Review effectiveness of ordinance enforcement <br /> and insure adequate procedures to enforce ordinance provisions. <br /> Perhaps this would be a job for a new Special Projects planner. <br /> * COMMENTS <br /> ,, Sharlene P'lkey reported that ordinance enforcement is just <br /> beginning and tfat with the influx of people, a very strong and steady <br /> enforcement <br /> pro ram will be important. <br /> COUNTY PLANNING RIORITIES <br /> SET OF ISSUES <br /> The Planning Board would like clear direction from the <br /> commissioners concerning the planning items which should receive top <br /> priority during the next six months (from now until June 1986) . It <br /> would also be helpful to have a tentative priority list for the <br /> following year (Tune 1986-June 1987) . <br /> Below are listed the top planning priorities given by Planning <br /> • <br /> Board members atLa Planning Board meeting last April, as well as <br /> priorities suggested in subsequent meetings and discussions. Included <br /> are priorities given by at least two or three members. Listed beside <br /> t each priority isi the tentative Planning Department division under <br /> whose responsibility the item would likely be included although these <br /> designations may be changed by the Planning Director. In addition, <br /> the proposed new Special Projects division is listed in some cases. <br /> After these planning priorities are discussed, there will be an <br /> opportunity for other priorities to be added. <br /> SET OF SUGGESTED ACTIONS <br /> The Planning Board would like the Commissioners to rank these <br /> planning items in a priority order so that the Planning Board and <br /> Planning Department will have guidance concerning which items should <br /> receive immediate attention. Therefore we would appreciate some <br /> direction cone the following g questions: <br /> (1) Which items should receive top priority for completion by <br /> June 1986 (FY 1985-86) and in what order of priority <br /> should they be completed? <br /> (2) Which items should receive priority (in FY 1986-87) for <br /> completion by June 1987 and in what order of priority <br /> should they be completed? <br /> (3) Which items should be delayed until after June 1987? <br /> SET OF PLANNING ITEMS TO BE RANKED IN PRIORITY ORDER <br /> 1. WATER RESOURCES (Comprehensive Planning) Includes <br /> designation of WQCA for Cane Creek and University Lake Reservoirs; <br /> I <br /> I <br />