Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-10-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 12-10-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 12:04:09 PM
Creation date
10/6/2016 11:38:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/1985
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> I ring Shoot <br /> '` r 1$. Io$ yin nti a1 Ares: Density '. - _ : : .:rr idoa[t t' '- <br /> ' •• ., #-$,What is the maximum density you would favor in the highe:stden r _ _. _ <br /> t -,:. ` - ?'' merino Nett Sewn 1$-a and 18-b as a unit - <br /> f T SSX4.& S •) 5•b•% 14 41.3.2. .. lir 3'1.6 <br /> "L'' 1 s units per acre tq lt3 <br /> amts k n e w acre ► <br /> 1$-b.teUt a'- er density(specify,)...r._-s <br /> . 19. Changes in s aerial laand Use plain farad ... <br /> .19-a Suppose en area is designated by densiW residential on the lead use <br /> - -�� --- "�.:attidpatlas)aandsuppose developer a►i hesto ertadiflarentnie late the'area.' <br /> _•,_ _s:r., _ - .ca a residential or commerckg use Under what conditions should <br /> . r-._W :.ce% <br /> . .. ir��cL.. A <br /> e In residential land be allowed? - M, ,• <br /> h o• <br /> - .-1-4.-VAliernative 1: By s majority vote of the planautg board—"---- <br /> oard _._-- - : <br /> .:4-.7~ r ~y 3L t�'9��)Aiternattve 2: Bye majority vote of the governing ---`---_ ' .• <br /> r 12..It.VI . <br /> { '' -..•. ... . nu: '4e b't r- Alternative 3: By a.majority vote of the governing but-oonty idler-� _._ . <br /> - natures of a majority of affected property owners be a been obtained:plate <br /> N•_ .•_ .. .z.._., (-Affected owners' owners of the area) <br /> _ -- - property owners within the surrounding <br /> . 2.0•Z s,•o•o • 4(p'°!'-' 2•Z• eiaat8 .®.®..'t <br /> E 4 57- w n't know 2 Cif(• o$asste�llow dove <br /> r; _ ,19-c Once an area is designated resident's!.should it remain rasident l for along- . : <br /> _- �" ` periodof time? (Choose one alternative below) T <br /> s.b.7. 2.9.1 fo• ,$. tt. 'b•Z•� . <br /> 5(7_,a,_° Yes-S yrs a°-�--jes-10 yrs aq�es-20 yrs!.r ten-ne er-ba changed ,-. <br /> - . ....... 4.b.o I•a•a 'g.t,•4 a`ti' i .,,;, , i' <br /> _ t 2•(.1.1•110 z t 't know z L 4 es 20 yr :ur never be damaged <br /> joint Planaitt8 Operating Principles i <br /> Cr: <br /> . .19. Urban gust. A policy of geographically <br /> constraining development results in . — <br /> - .a compact urban form where public services are extended over s smaller area. • _ <br /> . If development is not geographically constrained.his likely to-result in a larger <br /> _.. _ development pattern. �_..._ <br /> _ 2*It development be ge o,graphicalig constrained to give',compact url n <br /> qGs I%) yes_ '1 '1 &m um' 2__9. `+ 't know _ ra •-r <br /> 21. Mix of Residential Uses. Residential communities can have relati blame <br /> . _ areas of uniform use ore mixture of uses with relative',smaller areas for each. T- -� <br /> Sim Note saxw'e. .Z:aand 21-b$a omit. f <br /> 21-x. What is preference for the design in of residential communities?�. : .�, s your a. b.to (relative-- <br /> • *I IA C-r 1h3 large residential areas of uniform type and density <br /> 4_.:;_ -. , separation of low,medium.and high density uses and types) - <br /> 9.3•b <br /> . • - *2 12,(.14 t <br /> .'x• aiM,re of low,medium.and high density and a sitar types---to <br /> �. - *314 4 . Wretof low.medium.and high density residential us es and a . <br /> mix of types)along with small scale commercial areas <br /> al know <br /> { -_ 214 -_.....der(specify) <br /> N7_ , <br /> wu= <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.