|
.- •
<br /> i .0000
<br /> 61
<br /> Pep 2
<br /> , 1
<br /> 1 lateral Itaviiromaent -
<br /> •
<br /> 4. &minim/nisi Cesurailmte - ..--__-.--:_,---;...2... ...,..,...
<br /> Are there mess in the Joint Planning Area where you believe bu'ilding- •----:-: - '-::.• - '-: ,
<br /> should be rustricted because of environmental constraints(latawith slopeeisif--.
<br /> greater thowittaXereltah*llandutiewmiketuableweltaileele soilstf ' - . ---•:::----- s- * - --."-: • -
<br /> I zs•tr.14. t•b . 1..s•+ 4-12- * .
<br /> _ .5v(712)yes 4(.6 70 Neutral 5 factIN0 ::•grth.nit.moir -- V N
<br /> doubt be restricted.......................................----
<br /> ..... ._....•, . ,. .and(2)indicate how important such environmental constrainteihoiklbals-i-L. -=
<br /> • .....„,.................. ...........,..... ......
<br /> -fkstatainin* g location of development. :,..4.:-r-f:.....:L=:, ..'::::',..,...::::. 1.F.
<br /> -.. _ I I 6• es- Iq 'X*0*0 0•01
<br /> ,___,.,
<br /> 42.2delow— .....
<br /> ite importaattOgNeatridgAbietissportantabiltauftev ---- S,....4.4,44,
<br /> •••,
<br /> 3. Valor llespources . t %,....--L:.-.=- ....,:,'%-"--'--''•.- _
<br /> .:' ',7_*,.,:,,.. : . :,,,.,_; ',:,,, 7-3-stlo you believe there are probiems*Ili the water:unmasks;Ch!tlied Hill iiid-1:--.1--1 ,-,,,`::
<br /> the ierrouiding Joint Pienning Area? ...;.... .... .f*:;,-',:-:,-1.:z',0-._:.; .-4'.:tt-..:..4.:.: _-,.."
<br /> _..., .."'S.6•PA.toff t•t•2. 6..c*-1 I.01.1 -
<br /> . g7j 241
<br /> il .is * Ainglibutrid I Q10 3 efiapaai.itlios; . _ ri ..i.ti
<br /> — -
<br /> 6. Potostint Reservoir* Sites •,, .- ; -!----:.- ...-, . ....7._
<br /> -n_......-,...., - --, 7:Eta-Should'designated potentiel reservoir sites for future watessupPly be proteOtod- ---,-',2 z.,-- --,':
<br /> in the same alsener as existing reservosn' ?
<br /> a.6.-U ' • -
<br /> _ 2. - ._,..6. (05+4 Ye, 1 WI-Neutral ‘Ct_ ss
<br /> _ .... .L.lon..t.kauvw
<br /> • _ . ........_,.....
<br /> i • .. „
<br /> 7. Septic Teak Systems
<br /> • ... - ..,.-- . - 7-a Do you!aline there are problems vigh the UM(exotic tilt syst.eins hi tht- -:-.-
<br /> Joint Planning Area?
<br /> -k•z - i‘2.0-12./10 1.0.2. _ .A.ecir.,
<br /> .. . . 454574 Yes -&-Seatml 1461121130 1 3 Oa ,thesaknov .....9_,..141R
<br /> -,.. ._ ..........,-.
<br /> • I -.
<br /> •••:.:• I Infrastructure sad Public SerViCen
<br /> a. Tater andi Sever Extension Liadiatians _
<br /> -- lira Do you think public water and sewer lines should be limitettto the towns and ' -• .-- :-:= :
<br /> .,.,... ..2.... ,,,,74_ ._:issa,otion areas? (that Is.that the lines should sug be extended into-areas - •-ress designated.- -- --.. -.
<br /> '
<br /> rural buffer?) ...._
<br /> ._
<br /> • -. • . , :7
<br /> 4 _.. .„45(..5,1%)Yes, SlraLseutrat 23 0_111. Ito zi k
<br /> sgaos i4ksiwiv ..1. Of
<br /> th. Teter aid Sever Exteasion eas*Planning Teel • • ' - -- - - - •• -
<br /> • . •. :,..•:-. •,-- tit Should the Mansion of voter and sewer lines direct development(by allowing.• ' . * -.'-
<br /> -Haes.only where development Is desired) or should extenska be responsiaa to :• .• • -- - - ,,,-
<br /> • . development(by allowing lines to be instilled when requested far specific •...... . ..... ...... . ... -
<br /> development projects)? . . ._
<br /> . . • ... . • ..
<br /> i_ I '24.IL• IS . i-t'5
<br /> ;ay. 41..a2, 01 tension should direct development tilt......1alksuin1
<br /> . • , i-a.1
<br /> .
<br /> I SILb24
<br /> .41101140.11 shotdd he responsive to development ..-S.111,know .....1.04' R ,'
<br /> — .
<br /> I . isallabther- .b
<br /> I .
<br /> i
<br /> I
<br /> '
<br />
|